Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The respondent raised an objection to the maintainability of the present application on the ground that the petitioner being an agent governed under Section 48 of the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act, 1935, was required to approach the Registrar of the Cooperative Societies for initiating a dispute resolution proceeding.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal noted that Rule 4A (1)(i) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 requires disclosure of service tax payable on the value of service provided, thus, it cannot include exempted services. Moreover, a proviso inserted to the Rule by an amendment cannot enlarge the scope of the provision, at best it is only clarificatory.

Continue reading
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Speaker is an officer of the State Legislative Assembly, who presides and represents the House for all intents and purposes. Allegations of mala fide and arbitrary action, made against him cannot be accepted considering the high status of the office in a parliamentary system of democracy.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the Senior Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur should take appropriate steps regarding the threat perception to the minor and her friend and to ensure that the minor, her friend and his family members were protected from the physical harm by minor’s family member.

Continue reading
punjab and haryana high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that this was not the isolated case where the jurisdictional SSP of State had dispensed with inquiry. As soon as an FIR was registered against the police official, the jurisdictional SSPs opted to dispense with inquiry.

Continue reading
Patna High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that if the amendment was not allowed it would lead to unnecessary multiplicity of litigation, as the amendments appeared to be necessary to determine the real controversy between the parties.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that to speak or not to speak has always been a dilemma for a person called for giving his statement before the Customs Officer, Central Sales Tax Officer, Police Officer etc, as the implications are serious.

Continue reading
mens rea bad faith
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on essentiality of mens rea.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the petitioner was an adult and was entitled to her sovereign decisions for reproductive autonomy, and the views of her parents or of her partner were not relevant.

Continue reading
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that when considering the material produced, it appears improbable that the accused persons’ visit to the police station was solely to fabricate evidence.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stated that for a place to fall within the ambit of a public place, the element of right of access of public was a necessary concomitant.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stated that no court has held that prohibited goods were to be released for re-export without payment of redemption fine. Such a stance would encourage importers smuggling/making improper import of goods, to take a chance with the law and if caught, request for re-export without a fine.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that when the State Government had incurred huge amount of money for providing medical facilities to the public residing in remotest part of the State, and the authorities responsible were absent and missing when they were needed the most, the State ought to take some stringent measures.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court observed that spurious liquor can cause devastating trauma and huge tragedy. It affects the poor people who go for a cheaper alternative of liquor, as usually instead of ethyl alcohol such liquor contains methyl alcohol which is lethal in nature.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Petitioner stated that he had not filed any such or similar petition for quashing before the present Court or the Supreme Court. However, the Court noted that the petitioner had earlier filed the present petition on 01-04-2024 and the present petition was filed on 17-05-2024.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that parole enables a prisoner to develop a feeling of self-confidence that there is a life beyond prison and develop a sense of hope and active interest in his life with a view to rehabilitate the prisoner.

Continue reading
CESTAT
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal stated that there is no such condition in the Technology License Agreement which provides that royalty payment is a pre-condition for sale/import of raw materials and there is no evidence to establish how the royalty payment is linked to the import of raw materials.

Continue reading
Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the respondent took filmsy stand which was not acceptable and this was another glaring example of delay and laches on the respondents’ part for not extending the retirement benefits.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that as the executive has largely been unsuccessful in curbing the escalating threat of cybercrime, one potential solution could involve limiting the maximum number of prepaid SIM cards per individual as cybercrime predominantly takes place through prepaid SIM cards.

Continue reading
limitation period suit filed on possession of immovable property
Cases ReportedNever Reported Judgments

This report covers the Supreme Court’s Never Reported Judgment dating back to the year 1953 on limitation period of suit on possession of immovable property.

Continue reading