Whether the findings of the Supreme Court were binding onthe Single Judge under Article 141 and 144 Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Published on April 1, 2023October 16, 2025By Bhumika Indulia Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Related Leave a comment
Legislation Updates, Notifications What could change in insurance distribution? IRDAI proposes major reforms; comments till 25 October
Law School News, Others Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Delhi invites applications for One-Year LL.M. Programme 202627
Call For Papers, Law School News Vidhi Darpan Law Journal invites submissions for its upcoming issue; Deadline 5 December 2026
Law Firms News, News Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co advises Evonile Pharma Ltd. on acquisition of ‘Minipress’ and ‘Minipres’ brands from Pfizer
Case Briefs, Supreme Court Supreme Court: Gift of temple inam property to State Government void ab initio; State is custodian, not owner