Don’t rely on crowd sourced resources like Wikipedia; SC cautions Courts & Adjudicating Authorities Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Published on January 30, 2023October 16, 2025By Bhumika Indulia Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Related Tags : sourcesSupreme CourtWikipedia Leave a comment
Case Briefs, Supreme Court Grant of Anticipatory Bail to Accused with 22 FIRs “Very Unfortunate”; Criminal Antecedents Alone Sufficient to Deny Relief: Supreme Court
Op Eds, OP. ED. Decoding the Ministry’s Latest Clarifications: A Thematic Analysis of the Additional FAQs on the Four Labour Codes Answered by Ministry of Labour & Employment
Case Briefs, High Courts Bombay High Court Denies Urgent Relief Against Property Auction by Bank under SARFAESI Act
Case Briefs, High Courts Read Why Delhi HC awarded Rs 150+ Cr. in damages for patent infringement, while actual costs yet to be determined by Taxation Officer?
Law School News, Moot Court Announcements Call for Participation | SVKM’s Pravin Gandhi College of Law organises 6th PGCL SAARC International Moot Court Competition, 2026
Law School News, Others Call for Participation | Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights (CAIPR), Himachal Pradesh National Law University (HPNLU) announces National Virtual Intellectual Property Rights Essay Writing Competition 2.0, 2026