Supreme Court Post Vidya Drolia: Reconsidering Referral Jurisprudence in India
by Senu Nizar† and Velpula Audityaa††
by Senu Nizar† and Velpula Audityaa††
The accused had argued that the complainant and her family, out of ill will, had orchestrated the complaint and were extorting the petitioner for their own means and benefits. Rajasthan High Court, however, did not appreciate the fact that the previous complaints filed by the prosecutrix was closed on account of being frivolous and a closure report was also filed in the matter.
by Tarun Jain†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 85
The Supreme Court, while allowing the special leave petition filed by the petitioner, set aside the order passed by the Rajasthan High Court which had dismissed the anticipatory bail application without considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
by Raghavendra S. Srivatsa† and Amit A. Pai††
The bench of MR Shah and M.M Sundresh, JJ explained the importance of the words “or otherwise” inserted to Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 1987
Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by Telangana High Court, wherein the High Court dismissed the application
Supreme Court: In an appeal filed by Singapore airlines against the judgment passed by the Delhi High Court holding that
Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by the Kerala High Court confirming an order passed by the
On 24-11-2022, the Chief Justice of India, Dr Justice DY Chandrachud has launched the RTI Online Portal for the Supreme Court of
by Ishan Chauhan† and Harshdeep Singh††
by Sucheta Sarkar†
Supreme Court: In an appeal filed by the Food Corporation of India (‘FCI’) against the judgment of Tripura high Court
Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the judgment of Karnataka High Court reducing the total compensation from Rs. 21,08,400/-
Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by the Kerala High Court, wherein it has set aside the
Supreme Court: In an appeal against the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (‘NCDRC’), wherein the commission having
Supreme Court: In an appeal filed against the judgment passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (‘NCDRC’), wherein the
Supreme Court: In a writ petition filed against forced religious conversion the division bench of M.R. Shah and Hima Kohli said that
Supreme Court: In an appeal relating to the interpretation of ‘local area' occurring under Entry 52 of List II of