per incuriam

Supreme Court Article 32
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Finality of a lis is a core facet of a sound judicial system. Litigation which had concluded or had reached finality cannot be reopened. If this is permitted, then there will be no finality and no end to litigation. There will be chaos in the administration of justice.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court deemed the Coordinate Bench decision in Narmadi Prasad v. State of M.P., as per incuriam, as it did not consider the Aadhaar Card’s intended use solely as identity-only proof.

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Shruti Awasthi† and Arpit Singh††

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: While reversing the impugned decision of the Bombay High Court, M.R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., held that the prices

Op EdsOP. ED.

by Karl Shroff*

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In interesting turn of events, the 3-judge bench of Madan B. Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Deepak Gupta, JJ disagreed with

Supreme Court

Supreme Court: In a matter related to relaxing standards for candidates belonging to SC/ST in departmental competitive exams and departmental confirmation examinations,