Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case, there are concurrent findings that the accused persons abused the informant while he was discharging his duty in his office-cum-chamber and insulted him before public and subordinates. Further, the informant was pressurized to issue death certificate, which he was otherwise not agreeable to issue, after explaining the reasons.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In violation of the constitutional mandate to make appointment on regular basis, the State of Jharkhand appointed the appellant on daily wage basis and subsequently, on contractual basis and were utilizing the services of the appellant. There was no valid explanation for the same.

Disciplinary action after retirement
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Where the disciplinary proceeding itself is without jurisdiction, upholding the same on the specious plea that it was not challenged on the ground of lack of jurisdiction would be tantamount to giving imprimatur to a patently illegal proceeding”

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case, the petitioner has helped one lady against the allegation of incumbent sitting Chief Minister, which clearly suggests that maliciously the case was registered against the petitioner and the investigation was also made with pre-occupied mind.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Mere presence of the antecedents will not lead to a presumption about the active involvement of the accused in any activity, without any material proof in support.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Even if the ticket was not recovered from his person while preparing the inquest report of the deceased, mere filing of the affidavit on behalf of the appellant was sufficient to raise the presumption that the deceased was bona fide passenger.

Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao
Know thy Judge

Sworn in as 16th Chief Justice of the High Court of Jharkhand on 25-09-2024, Justice M. S. Ramachandra Rao, a 3rd generation Judge, also served as Chief Justice of High Court of Himachal Pradesh.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The prosecution case has crumbled like a house of cards. Neither the circumstances have been proved which can lead to a conclusion that the accused was complicit in offence, nor any consistent prosecution version has come which can be relied upon.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is alleged that the local MLA-the petitioner and his supporters visited Hospital to show their sympathy to the victim and her family member and after taking name, address and photograph of victim, it was sent to media and other organization from the petitioner’s mobile number.

Criminal Law Monthly Roundup August 2024
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

Criminal law discussions that unfolded at the Supreme Court and various High Courts in the month of August

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The intention of the legislature is derived by considering the meaning of the words used in the statute, with a view to understand the purpose or object of the enactment, the mischief, and its corresponding remedy that the enactment is designed to actualise.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

If the sale-deed is duly executed and sufficiently stamped and there is no legal or formal defect, the Registering Authority cannot refuse to register the deed.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Any irregularity committed during investigation could not be the sole ground to discard the prosecution case in its entirety, if it was otherwise proved by other cogent and reliable evidence.

Criminal Law Monthly Roundup July 2024
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

Read July’s share of criminal law discussions at the Supreme Court and various High Courts

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that admittedly, the death is homicidal, and the doctor also found that the cause of death is injury, which was inflicted upon the deceased persons. Therefore, the ocular evidence corroborates with the medical evidence.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that by delaying the disposal of the application filed by the petitioner, the District Magistrate is frustrating the intent of law, which should not be.

High Court Weekly Roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

High Court Weekly Roundup
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that allowing the proceedings to continue will amount to an abuse of the process of law.

Jharkhand High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that when a decision of a coordinate bench of the same High Court is brought in notice, it is to be respected and is binding to the Bench of such co-equal strength. For taking a different view, it is required to refer the question to the larger bench, as it is the only course of action open to a Bench of a co-equal strength.