Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Rights’ Disputes: An Affirmative Step
by Yash Vardhan Garu and Hetvi Mehta
arbitration and conciliation act
Delhi High Court | Review is permissible against an order dismissing a petition under S. 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
While exercising the power conferred by Section 11 of the Act, the Court ceases to be a Court of Record and the review or reopening of proceedings which is sought is not with respect to any power exercised by the Court under Section 11 on merits but on account of the evident factual mistake in that order.
Delhi High Court | When a prayer to appoint an Arbitrator has been heard and rejected, the same relief cannot be sought by filing a review petition
Mere expression “place of arbitration” cannot be the basis to determine the intention of the parties that they have intended that place as the “Seat of Arbitration”
When is the interest rate payable under Section 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006 applicable?
by Hiresh Choudhary† and Surbhi Sharma††
2022 SCC Vol. 10 Part 2
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 14(1)(a) and 2(1)(e) r/w Ss. 11(5) and 11(6) — Application seeking termination of
Supreme Court Post Vidya Drolia: Reconsidering Referral Jurisprudence in India
by Senu Nizar† and Velpula Audityaa††
Mandatory and Directory Provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
by Manavendra Mishra† and Alok Vajpeyi††
Explained| Three types of issues that can be considered in an application filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Supreme Court: In an appeal against the judgment passed by Telangana High Court, wherein the High Court dismissed the application
Call for Papers | RGNUL RSRR Volume 9 Issue 2 [Submit Abstract by December 20, 2022]
About RSRR The RGNUL Student Research Review (RSRR) Journal is a bi-annual, student-run, blind peer-reviewed, flagship journal based at Rajiv
Preliminary Inquiry under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
by Ayushi Raghuwanshi*
Uttaranchal High Court | Commercial Court cannot modify arbitral award in absence of manifest and patent error/illegality
Uttaranchal High Court: The Division Bench of Sanjaya Kumar Mishra and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, JJ. allowed appeals filed by the
2022 SCC Vol. 9 Part 2
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 31(7) and Ss. 17, 21, 23(3), 24(1), 25, 26, 29 and 85(2)(a) —
Mandatory Pre-Institution Mediation — Effective Remedy to Declog Courts in India
by Abhijnan Jha* and Urvashi Misra**
The Growing Need for Data Protection in International Arbitration
by Tariq Khan†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 76
Madras High Court | Courts will not interfere or set aside an arbitral award, merely because an alternative view is possible; Adopt a hands-off approach
Madras High Court: In an intra-Court appeal filed against the order of the single judge, whereby, the judge allowed the