delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The defendants are allowed to use the mark ‘Imperial Vat No.1’ as their trade mark for any fresh manufacture, along with the proposed packaging/label/get up and with the emblem/coat of arms, without the mark/name ‘Green Valley’.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Their marriage had a rocky start and unfortunately, differences and the mistrust which got generated in the beginning did not let their relationship flourish further.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court recognises the need to take stringent action as the application reveals that there is misuse of the domain names and the two logos – Crescent Logo Design and Hamburger Refresh Design Logo.”

Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The least conspicuous part of Parle’s label is, in fact, the “For the Bold!” tagline, featuring towards the lower edge of the label. It is only a customer who is particularly searching for the tagline who, therefore, would notice it.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

There is no dispute to the legal position that the spouse is liable to maintain the other spouse and children, however, equity shall be maintained only if one is directed to pay interim maintenance to his/her capacity.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In the act of balancing individual property rights and overarching public interest, the latter must take precedence. The scale tips in favour of a solution that serves the larger community and ensures the most efficient use of public resources.”

unceasing confusion surrounding
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Onkar Thakur†

jawan film copyright
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court issued directions after identification a person against whom, previous actions were being taken in the name of Ashok Kumar/ John Doe.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

There is a reasonable possibility that the appellant was one of the links in the network of people who were cognizant of the plan to trigger terrorist activity by using such bombs and explosives and causing loss of life.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The edifice of a vibrant constitutional democracy rests on the pillars of rule of law, which needs to be preserved with full vigour to maintain the sanctity of judicial proceedings.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Family Courts must restrict their considerations to the parameters of the provision of grant of divorce strictly in accordance with the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (‘Act’). Irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground in the Act.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Article 21 of the Constitution gives Protection of Life and Personal Liberty to all persons whereby it is the inherent right of every individual to exercise personal choices, especially in matter relating to marriage.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Given the distinct role played by the Public Prosecutors, it becomes imperative that the appointees are adequately equipped to shoulder the weighty responsibilities the post carries.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The decree holder was not required to await the outcome of the objections filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, however, if it did choose to remain under a self-imposed embargo, then it can’t demand interest.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There are repeated cases wherein litigants have raised allegations against Trade Marks Agents and Patent Agents and apart from reprimand from courts, there are no other consequences that visit them.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Once the petitioner had paid the duties as contemplated under Section 3 of the Tariff Act, 1975, it could not be possibly contended that the goods were imported ‘duty free’.”

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In case of an alleged mismatch of details of the candidate during document verification, the caste certificate ought to be read in conjunction with other documents.

delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In Southern Electricity Supply Co. of Orissa Ltd. v. Sri Seetaram Rice Mill, (2012) 2 SCC 108, Supreme Court held that where a consumer has used excessive load as against the installed load simpliciter and there is violation of the terms and conditions of supply, then, the case would fall under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003.