Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petition was requested to be treated as a representation since the Government is in the process of receiving inputs on the new criminal laws from various stakeholders.

Advocate Tejas Dhirenbhai Karia Delhi Judge arbitration
Appointments & TransfersNews

The Collegium noted that Advocate Karia is a domain expert in the law of arbitration and has extensive experience in conducting arbitrations, both domestic and international.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Merely because a parent entity may exercise shareholder influence over its subsidiary that would not lead to an assumption that the subsidiary in question was operating as a mere puppet or that it was wholly subservient to the parent entity.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Asking the student to continue studying in the MCD school would be tantamount to an onslaught on his constitutional rights and the Constitutional Court would be failing in its duty to secure the fundamental rights of the young citizen.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The language used by the advocate had scandalized the court and such conduct also leads to interference in the administration of justice.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that the defendants shall continue their business of pre-owned goods of the plaintiff. However, the defendants shall conspicuously display on their website that the goods sold by them, are certified pre-owned goods of the plaintiff.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Despite a delay of three years, not even an Enquiry Officer had been appointed in the department proceedings against Gurjinder Pal Singh.

K. Kavitha
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The CBI and the ED have claimed that K. Kavitha was involved in the exchange of bribes and money laundering in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

By denying the opportunity for continuous education in a school run by the same society, a pitiable situation frequently arises where, due to the two different identification numbers assigned by the DoE to the school’s junior and senior wings, financial segregation of students is indirectly perpetuated.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Chief Business Strategy Officer was a clearing agent and thus, his job was not that of a stockbroker but merely of acting as a facilitator between the stock exchange and the broker.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘In the present case, the victim and his family had suffered at the hands of an insensitive and callous administration and had to approach the Constitutional Courts four times for the redressal of his grievances.’

HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick review of various High Court cases reported this week

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The decision to disclose or withhold information should be made judiciously, considering the stipulations of Section 8 of the RTI Act. This approach ensures that the provisions of the RTI Act are not compromised, while also respecting the confidentiality required in judicial proceedings.

S. 531 of BNSS
Experts CornerShardul Amarchand Mangaldas

by Aditya Mukherjee* and Jayati Sinha**

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

An FIR was registered against Puja Khedkar after she allegedly supplied false information regarding her identity to the Union Public Service Commission.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court calculated the disability incurred by the claimant after the accident so as to determine a just and reasonable compensation.

Proceeds of Crime
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ajay Wadhwa* and Ragini Handa**

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The direction given by the Sole Arbitrator to exclude the period from 31-03-2015 to 31-03-2017 for calculation of pre-litigation interest was contrary to the express terms in the Agreement made between the parties.

HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick review of reported cases this week from various High Courts across the country

detention orders under COFEPOSA
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The question of law which revolved around right of making representation being seriously jeopardized as detenus were supplied with various documents as parts of relied upon documents (‘RUDs’) which are illegible, incomplete and not readable violating Article 22 (5) of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 (3) of COFEPOSA Act, was kept open.