HIGH COURTS SEPTEMBER 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

Take a quick glance at what the High Courts were discussing in this late Monsoon season.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 does not envisage the CCPD as an adjudicatory body capable of deciding service-related disputes or issuing enforceable orders.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act aims and visualizes a situation where there may not be an institution of any fresh case, once the matter is settled through pre-institution mediation.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Such a legal vacuum disabling the villagers from managing their immovable properties prima facie violates their fundamental right under Article 21 and constitutional rights under Article 300A of the Constitution.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A person castigating their employer through a constant tirade of false and scandalous allegations does not deserve to continue in the employment of the said employer.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The dual-language approach will help in preventing future instances of non-compliance due to language barriers and ensure that the rights and opportunities are accessible to all citizens, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The term “Aashiqui” does not describe the general category of goods or services (films) but instead functions as a distinctive brand identifier for the Aashiqui Franchise.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

As per Clause 26.2 of the Agreement, the Chairman/Managing Director of the Board of Directors of Contractors was supposed to do the conciliation and not the committee constituted by NHIDCL.

Criminal Law Monthly Roundup August 2024
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

Criminal law discussions that unfolded at the Supreme Court and various High Courts in the month of August

Intellectual Property Rights Roundup
Legal RoundUpTopic-wise Roundup

A quick recap of top Intellectual Property cases on sale of counterfeit copies of EBC’s books, Nizam’s trade mark, Mankind v. Mercykind, Adidas, L’Oréal, Electronica, and more.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present dispute between Express Newspapers and the Government has spanned over five decades and has witnessed critical historical events such as the Emergency and its aftermath.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘The functions performed by the Election Commission of India under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 are essentially quasi-judicial in nature, and any order issued thereunder constitutes a quasi-judicial order.’

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Donations, gifts etc., which were being received by the appellant, and being vested in the committee, from various institutions will be endowments for public purpose.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Reputation is an essential attribute of personality, and the violation of this right is actionable both as a tort as well as a crime.’

Justice Hima Kohli retirement
Know thy Judge

Justice Hima Kohli, who bids farewell to the Supreme Court, became the first woman Chief Justice of the High Court for the State of Telangana and became the ninth woman to be elevated to the Supreme Court of India.

EBC's counterfeit products
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court directed the Commissioners to conduct a search at the book houses and seize the infringing products bearing EBC’s registered trade marks or containing contents identical or deceptively similar to EBC’s books, books without hologram, packaging, labels, printing material and other material that reflect infringement of copyright and trade mark.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The petition was requested to be treated as a representation since the Government is in the process of receiving inputs on the new criminal laws from various stakeholders.

Advocate Tejas Dhirenbhai Karia Delhi Judge arbitration
Appointments & TransfersNews

The Collegium noted that Advocate Karia is a domain expert in the law of arbitration and has extensive experience in conducting arbitrations, both domestic and international.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Merely because a parent entity may exercise shareholder influence over its subsidiary that would not lead to an assumption that the subsidiary in question was operating as a mere puppet or that it was wholly subservient to the parent entity.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Asking the student to continue studying in the MCD school would be tantamount to an onslaught on his constitutional rights and the Constitutional Court would be failing in its duty to secure the fundamental rights of the young citizen.