Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

By denying the opportunity for continuous education in a school run by the same society, a pitiable situation frequently arises where, due to the two different identification numbers assigned by the DoE to the school’s junior and senior wings, financial segregation of students is indirectly perpetuated.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Chief Business Strategy Officer was a clearing agent and thus, his job was not that of a stockbroker but merely of acting as a facilitator between the stock exchange and the broker.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘In the present case, the victim and his family had suffered at the hands of an insensitive and callous administration and had to approach the Constitutional Courts four times for the redressal of his grievances.’

HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick review of various High Court cases reported this week

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The decision to disclose or withhold information should be made judiciously, considering the stipulations of Section 8 of the RTI Act. This approach ensures that the provisions of the RTI Act are not compromised, while also respecting the confidentiality required in judicial proceedings.

S. 531 of BNSS
Experts CornerShardul Amarchand Mangaldas

by Aditya Mukherjee* and Jayati Sinha**

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

An FIR was registered against Puja Khedkar after she allegedly supplied false information regarding her identity to the Union Public Service Commission.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court calculated the disability incurred by the claimant after the accident so as to determine a just and reasonable compensation.

Proceeds of Crime
Op EdsOP. ED.

by Ajay Wadhwa* and Ragini Handa**

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The direction given by the Sole Arbitrator to exclude the period from 31-03-2015 to 31-03-2017 for calculation of pre-litigation interest was contrary to the express terms in the Agreement made between the parties.

HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick review of reported cases this week from various High Courts across the country

detention orders under COFEPOSA
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The question of law which revolved around right of making representation being seriously jeopardized as detenus were supplied with various documents as parts of relied upon documents (‘RUDs’) which are illegible, incomplete and not readable violating Article 22 (5) of the Constitution of India read with Section 3 (3) of COFEPOSA Act, was kept open.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

V. Vijaya Sai Reddy was a sitting member of Rajya Sabha and the baseless allegations made in the impugned videos and posts had the potential of adversely affecting his political career and reputation which had been built carefully over the years.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The direction for taking down the impugned video was necessary since India Today was unable to state whether or not Rajdeep Sardesai had been authorized to use the impugned video.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The word ‘he’ in Section 3 of the POCSO Act could not be given a restrictive meaning to say that it referred only to a ‘male’.

S. 29-A of Arbitration Act
Experts CornerVasanth Rajasekaran

by Vasanth Rajasekaran* and Harshvardhan Korada**

HIGH COURT AUGUST 2024 WEEKLY ROUNDUP
High Court Round UpLegal RoundUp

A quick review of reported cases this week from various High Courts across the country

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides for taking a registered trade mark off the Register on account of non-use of the trade mark.

Rouse Avenue Bar Association
Hot Off The PressNews

The Delhi High Court had ruled that the Central Delhi Court Bar Association shall be recognized as the Court annexed Bar Association for the Rouse Avenue District Court Complex in the national capital.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Deletion of party is an issue to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal, it cannot be looked into by the Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act”