Examination of a ballistic expert is not an inflexible rule in every case involving use of a lethal weapon: SC
Supreme Court: In a case where deceased had sustained a gun-shot injury with a point of entry and exit, the 3-judge bench
Continue readingThis column will list all the case briefs on the decisions of the Supreme Court
Supreme Court: In a case where deceased had sustained a gun-shot injury with a point of entry and exit, the 3-judge bench
Continue reading
“It is trite to point out that an order secured by fraud and misrepresentation will not confer any vested right and that, therefore, the land owners cannot pitch their claim either on the basis of vesting or on the basis of Article 300A.”
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJI and AS Bopanna* and Hima Kohli, JJ has elaborated on the question as
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud* and A S Bopanna, JJ., held that the powers of NCLT
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where the order was dictated in the court, but had not been signed, the 3-judge bench of
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has issued a series of directions after it was brought to
Continue reading
Supreme Court: Despite a slipshod investigation in a case, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, Surya Kant and Hima Kohli*, JJ has
Continue reading
Supreme Court: While dealing with a case of abetment and conspiracy for commission of criminal misconduct by public servant, the Division Bench
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench of N.V. Ramana, CJ., Surya Kant* and Hima Kohli, JJ., held that the Bank is not the
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where it was alleged that more than one consumer cannot institute a complaint unless they come within
Continue reading
Supreme Court: After it was brought to the Court’s notice that several fake claim petitions were being filed for getting compensation under
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The Division Bench of R. Subhash Reddy* and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ., held that once the fresh notification is issued by
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where, on apprehending the accused, while making search of the motor cycle, 900 gm of smack was
Continue reading
“… while the stigma and discrimination against persons with mental health disorders are rampant in society, as the highest constitutional court of the country, it falls upon us to ensure that societal discrimination does not translate into legal discrimination.”
Continue reading
Supreme Court: In a case where a soldier, after serving in the Regular Army for 25 years, was re-enrolled in the Infantry
Continue reading
Supreme Court: Upholding the concurrent findings of High Court as well as Sessions Court and Juvenile Justice Board, the Division Bench comprising
Continue reading
Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and B.V. Nagarathna*, JJ., held that if on the consideration of the medical
Continue reading
“The allotment of plots in the discretionary quota cannot be at the whims of the persons in power.”
Continue reading
“A rule of interpretation which produces different results, depending upon what the individuals do or do not do, is inconceivable.”
Continue reading
“If it is held that the borrower can still, as a matter of right, pray for benefit under the OTS Scheme, in that case, it would be giving a premium to a dishonest borrower.”
Continue reading