Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“The principle of determination of inter se seniority amongst direct recruits and promote officers makes it clear that for the purpose of fixation of inter se seniority, the date to be reckoned for the direct recruits is “the date of appointment.”
Continue reading
Calcutta High Court dismissed all the three criminal revision applications seeking quashing of the criminal proceedings and deemed them groundless.
Continue reading
The animals were loaded 3-4 times beyond the capacity of the vehicles, no provision for first-aid equipment, fodder, and water in the vehicle.
Continue reading
It is quite unfortunate that the archaic beliefs that if a widow enters a temple, it will cause impurity continues to prevail in this State. Even though the reformers are attempting to break all these senseless beliefs, it continues to be practiced in some villages.
Continue reading
The Court passed no further orders considering the information provided in the Status Report and the measures taken by the authorities concerned towards the implementation of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the Trial Court failed to properly adjudicate the issue related to calculation of limitation period.
Continue reading
The Calcutta High Court held the considerations by both the BDO as well as the Appellate Authority were extremely cryptic, and they shirked their responsibility by rejecting the petitioner's application.
Continue reading
The 55 petitioners in the instant matter claimed that they were denied compensation of lands acquired for public purposes.
Continue reading
NCLT seeks response from respondents to the application for refunds to passengers under Section 60(5) of IBC.
Continue reading
Calcutta High Court quashed the criminal proceeding pending before the Judicial Magistrate and all related orders.
Continue reading
The traffic authorities are the best judges to decide the issue of regulation of traffic in the city and the Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot sit over as an Appellate Authority over the decisions taken by the traffic authorities for regulating the movement of traffic in the city.
Continue reading
There is no such thing under the SAST Regulations that acquisition and holding of shares without making a public announcement is a violation.
Continue reading
“It is duty of the Reporting Officer and the Reviewing Officer to take care not only that in their assessment of overall performance of the subordinate officer but also they are not influenced by any personal interest, bias or malice.”
Continue reading
“Rejection of the disability contained the reason that the petitioner is suffering with Locomotor Disability which is a physical disability and the same is assessed as zero per cent, so no certificate is provided to the petitioner with respect to the disability suffered by him.”
Continue reading
Delhi High Court had granted bail to Preeti Chandra through order dated 14-06-2023.
Continue reading
“The Delhi Government is directed to ensure that the necessary systems and cloud service is made available to all the Sub-Registrars’ offices so that the documents can be preserved without a situation as arose in the present case being repeated.”
Continue reading
Madras High Court rejected the argument that compensation has been already paid to the petitioner, thus the question of providing employment to the surviving daughter will not arise, as the petitioner is relying upon the provision of a Special Act.
Continue reading
The Postal Department has a sacred duty in upholding Trust as the nation’s preferred carrier and guardian of savings.
Continue reading
Supreme Court regarded the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 as a special Act expressly and exclusively dealing with the schedule-enumerated conditions of service of workmen in industrial establishments, giving recognition and form to workmen’s hard-won and precious rights.
Continue reading
The main grievance of the plaintiff is that defendant 2 has by adopting a trade dress for its BERKINS brand range of shoes which is nearly identical to the plaintiff’s RS-X range of shoes, sought to pass off its products as those of the plaintiff.
Continue reading