Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“The Trial Court, shall not act like a post master that receives the final report from the Police and blindly proceed to frame charges on the premise that the final report would be perfect in all respects.”
Continue reading
The Court questioned whether these protesters would clean up the streets, vacate them, go back home and let peace and let the tranquility prevail in Mumbai, so that the common man can lead a normal life?
Continue reading
By allowing production of documents directly pertinent to the issues in dispute, the Court ensured the wife’s access to necessary evidence, while avoiding unnecessary intrusion into unrelated financial matters. Such a calibrated approach aligns with the principle of proportionality and prevents the discovery process from becoming a fishing expedition.
Continue reading
The Court further noted that the new statutory framework under Telecommunications Act, 2023 and Telecommunications (Right of Way) Rules, 2024, now governs the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunication towers.
Continue reading
Catch up with the important Service Law cases across various High Courts and the Supreme Court as well as the legislative updates.
Continue reading
“There has to be paradigm shift in societal mindset by attaching stigma to the accused and not to the girl who underwent the horrid suffering by way of rape.”
Continue reading
The distinction between male and female has, in the present time, been reduced to nothing more than a chance chromosomal circumstance, and ascribing, to it, any greater relevance would be illogical as well as anachronistic.
Continue reading
The solider was not aware of the benefit of war injury pension, but the petitioners very well knew that the solider suffered an injury in war and is entitled to such benefit but still did not grant the said benefit and rather expected such solider to revert back, to claim the said benefit.
Continue reading
‘The extraordinary jurisdiction of a writ Court should be invoked when the foundational jurisdictional fact of child being in illegal custody is demonstrably established or such exercise of jurisdiction is warranted by welfare of the child.’
Continue reading
Explore the key legal developments of August 2025, featuring the NHRC’s suo motu interventions, the NCLAT Judicial Member’s recusal amid claims of influence, SEBI’s penalties for insider trading, and the CCPA’s fine on Rapido for misleading ads.
Continue reading
The investment was a key element of the REIT’s pre-IPO capital raise aimed at consolidating real estate assets (commercial office spaces) across India and strengthening its financial position. The REIT was successfully listed on the BSE and the NSE on August 18, 2025.
Continue reading
DMD Advocates emerged as the champions of the inaugural season of the M3M LawStrings Pickleball Cup
Continue reading
by Samriddhi Agarwal* and Nazia Rahman**
Continue reading
Justice Sanjeev Kumar has been placed in suspension following a disciplinary proceeding.
Continue reading
Applications invited for 5-year integrated B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) and B.B.A. LL.B. (Hons.) programmes at the BITS Pilani, Mumbai Campus
Continue reading
“Any news, in respect of Courts and its working, made with a motive of degrading the judicial institution or lowering its prestige in the eyes of general public, eroded the public trust in the Courts and must be viewed as an ill-motivated interference in the administration of justice.”
Continue reading
The Court suggested the Police to install cameras on the route on which the procession had to be carried on in order to keep an eye on trouble mongers.
Continue reading
Delhi High Court observed that one of the primary objects of bail was to secure the presence of the accused during trial. The accused has been in custody since 7-11-2024, has cooperated throughout the investigation, and there is nothing to suggest that he would abscond, interfere with evidence, or influence witnesses.
Continue reading
“The fee was charged from the petitioner in accordance with the Resolution of 2010 whereby the State Bar Council was authorized to collect enrollment fee but the realization of such fee for transfer of enrollment was not permissible under Section 18(1) of the 1961 Act.”
Continue reading