Skip to content

SCC Times

Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News

Site navigation

Home
News
OP. ED.
Experts Corner
Case Briefs
Legislation
Legal RoundUp
Cases Reported
Law School News
Law made Easy
- Law made Easy
Know thy Judge
Interviews
Events & Collaborations
- International
- Domestic
Mental Health
- Articles
- A Talk
Book Reviews
Jobs & Internships
Master SCC Online
WATCH NOW
Subscribe

Home
WATCH NOW
SCC Times Newsflash
Mother, being the only natural guardian after biological father’s death, can decide child’s surname

Mother, being the only natural guardian after biological father’s death, can decide child’s surname

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Telegram
More

Print
Email
Reddit

Published on July 30, 2022October 16, 2025By Bhumika Indulia

Facebook
X
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Telegram
More

Print
Email
Reddit

Related

Leave a comment

Post navigation

Previous storyKerala High Court| Diplomatic officers empowered to apostille affidavits and do notarial acts; Indo-Canadian couple allowed to get married “online”

Next storyMother, being the only natural guardian after biological father’s death, can decide child’s surname; can even give the child in adoption: SC

Most Read

24 hours
7 days
All time

meghalaya high court

Case Briefs, High Courts

‘AMPT Road to be in top condition’; Meghalaya HC directs State PWD to undertake complete overhauling

SCC Times Newsflash, WATCH NOW

Amishi Arora, Amity University, Noida at the 9th EBC-SCC Online Student Ambassador Conclave 2026

MNLU-CS Call for Papers

Call For Papers, Law School News

MNLU-CS | Call for Papers: Volume IV Issue II of Journal for Dispute Resolution

resignation and defection

Case Briefs, High Courts

Resignation does not end anti-defection proceedings: Madras HC on AIADMK MLAs who resigned and later joined TVK

SAM Partner Hires

Law Firms News, News

Khaitan & Co. advises JSW Steel and JSW Cement on JSW One Platforms’ proposed ₹30,540.10 Million IPO

Non-return of stridhan under S. 406 IPC

Case Briefs, High Courts

Mere non-return of Stridhan insufficient for S. 406 IPC without specific entrustment or dominion; Delhi HC quashes S. 406 proceedings, allows S. 498A case to continue

Join the discussion

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Δ

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get weekly latest news and updates in your e-mail

News Submissions

blog@scconline.com

Article Submissions

articles@scconline.com

Download SCC Online App for Android Users/IOS Users

Disclaimer : The content of this Blog are for informational purposes only and for the reader's personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the personal views of EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or omissions, whether arising from negligence, accident or any other cause.

© EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.

×