Himachal Pradesh High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Surya Kant, CJ and Ajay Mohan Goel, J. allowed the petitioner to appear one more time before the committee for his grievances.

The petitioner’s counsel Ajay Shandil had stated that the petitioner appeared in the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) of Arts conducted by the Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education, Dharamshala the result of which has been declared. It was claimed that he had answered the question number 4 correctly but as there was an anomaly in answer key in Hindi vis-a-vis English medium, his answer was evaluated incorrectly depriving him his due marks.

The Court here stated that such like issues were to be examined by an Expert Committee constituted by the Board and it was their discretion to consider the representations against the answer key and the petitioner anyway has made his representation therebefore. Nonetheless, the court granted one more opportunity to the petitioner to appear before the said committee and state his grievances. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of.[Manoj Sharma v. State of H.P.,2018 SCC OnLine HP 1759, decided on 12-12-2018]

Must Watch

SCC Blog Guidelines

Justice BV Nagarathna

call recording evidence in court


Join the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.