Don’t rely on crowd sourced resources like Wikipedia; SC cautions Courts & Adjudicating Authorities Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Published on January 30, 2023October 16, 2025By Bhumika Indulia Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Share on X (Opens in new window) X Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Print (Opens in new window) Print Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Related Tags : sourcesSupreme CourtWikipedia Leave a comment
Case Briefs, High Courts Can marriage or divorce be performed via a notarised agreement under Hindu Law? Madhya Pradesh HC answers
Legislation Updates, Notifications BCI Directs Universities to Inspect All Law Colleges Within Six Weeks; Warns Against Weekend and Evening Law Courses
Case Briefs, Supreme Court “Wrong statement” is not the same as “false statement”: Supreme Court quashes prosecution under Section 340 CrPC against litigant and counsel
SCC Times Newsflash, WATCH NOW BCI Announces Major Reforms Following Supreme Court Directions; National Legal Academy Proposed
Law Firms News, News Khaitan & Co. represents OpenAI, the Developers of ChatGPT, in landmark AI copyright dispute before Delhi HC