
Delay of 1011 days condoned by Andhra Pradesh HC! What a grave error, holds Supreme Court
Supreme Court: In a case where the Andhra Pradesh High Court had condoned a delay of 1011 days even though no sufficient
Continue readingSupreme Court: In a case where the Andhra Pradesh High Court had condoned a delay of 1011 days even though no sufficient
Continue readingSupreme Court: The bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has issued a series of directions after it was brought to
Continue readingSupreme Court: Upholding the concurrent findings of High Court as well as Sessions Court and Juvenile Justice Board, the Division Bench comprising
Continue readingSupreme Court: The Division Bench of Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud and B.V. Nagarathna*, JJ., held that if on the consideration of the medical
Continue reading“The allotment of plots in the discretionary quota cannot be at the whims of the persons in power.”
Continue reading“If it is held that the borrower can still, as a matter of right, pray for benefit under the OTS Scheme, in that case, it would be giving a premium to a dishonest borrower.”
Continue readingSupreme Court: The Division Bench of M. R. Shah* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., held that where the Arbitrator appointed by the High
Continue reading“We are at pains to observe the manner in which the present case has been dealt with by the trial court as well as by the High Court, particularly, when the trial court awarded death penalty to the accused and the High Court confirmed it.”
Continue reading“Discrimination, which is not based on any reasonable classification, is violative of all canons of equality enshrined in the Constitution of India.”
Continue readingSupreme Court: In a case where the trial court had convicted the accused and imposed death penalty on the very same day,
Continue readingSupreme Court: The bench of MR Shah and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that merely because some of the persons who might
Continue readingSupreme Court: The 3-Judges Bench comprising of D.Y. Chandrachud, Vikram Nath* and B.V. Nagarathna, JJ., set aside the seniority list prepared by
Continue readingSupreme Court: Explaining the scope of Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna,
Continue reading“No leniency should be shown to an accused who is found to be guilty for the offence under the NDPS Act. Those persons who are dealing in narcotic drugs are instruments in causing death or in inflicting death blow to a number of innocent young victims who are vulnerable.
Continue readingSupreme Court: Explaining the scope of jurisdiction of ITAT, the bench of MR Shah* and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that the
Continue reading“For vitiating the proceedings, something more than a mere lack of authority has to be established.”
Continue reading“There is a bounden duty cast on the Courts to elicit information of all the relevant factors and consider those regarding the possibility of reformation, even if the accused remains silent.”
Continue reading“Once the contractor agrees that he shall not be entitled to interest on the amounts payable under the contract, including the interest upon the earnest money and the security deposit, the arbitrator in the arbitration proceedings being the creature of the contract has no power to award interest”
Continue readingSupreme Court: In a case where the Gujarat High Court had quashed criminal proceedings at the behest of persons who were not
Continue readingSupreme Court: In a case where Rajasthan High Court had granted bail by merely “keeping in view the facts and circumstances of
Continue reading