Section 112(8) pre-deposit
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Tribunal held that the proviso inserted to Section 112(8) of the CGST Act by the Finance Act, 2025 does not operate retrospectively. Since the proceedings had commenced prior to 01-10-2025, the appellant’s vested right of appeal could not be burdened by a subsequently introduced condition requiring pre-deposit of 10 % of the penalty.

Section156(3) CrPC application directions
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The judgment of the Court will always be retrospective in nature unless the judgment itself specifically states that the judgment will operate prospectively”.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court criticised the state of uncertainty among various officers due to inconsistent application of the Ordinance and suggested that the State Government should have provided clarity.