![NCLAT Almost Settles the Dust](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/NCLAT-Almost-Settles-the-Dust-440x293.webp)
One Time Settlement
![NCLAT Almost Settles the Dust](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/NCLAT-Almost-Settles-the-Dust-440x293.webp)
![](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/MicrosoftTeams-image-637-440x293.png)
2023 SCC Vol. 2 Part 4
Constitution of India — Arts. 14, 12, 266, 136 and 32 — State action in a matter arising from non-statutory contract: Scope
![Delhi High Court](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Delhi-High-Court-1-391x293.jpg)
Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be filed for seeking alteration in contract: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court held that a borrower cannot ask for alteration of contract by way of a writ petition and a contract can only be altered through mutual consent between the parties.
![NCLAT](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/NCLAT_New-440x293.jpg)
NCLAT | Can the OTS proposal be an ‘acknowledgment of debt’ under S. 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963?
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Delhi: The Bench of Anant Bijay Singh, J., Judicial Member, and Shreesha Merla, Technical Member,
![](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/MicrosoftTeams-image-7-1-440x293.png)
No borrower can claim benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme as a right; Can’t encourage dishonest borrowers: SC
“If it is held that the borrower can still, as a matter of right, pray for benefit under the OTS Scheme, in that case, it would be giving a premium to a dishonest borrower.”
![](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/RBI-1-440x293.jpg)
One Time Settlement of NPAs
As per instructions of Reserve Bank of India, banks are required to have a loan recover policy, which may cover, inter alia, negotiated settlements