MP High Court designates 27 Advocates as Senior Advocates
The Advocates who secured above 50 points were recommended for designation as Senior Advocates by the Permanent Committee.
The Advocates who secured above 50 points were recommended for designation as Senior Advocates by the Permanent Committee.
These guidelines will remain in force until the Government of Madhya Pradesh examines the situation and incorporates appropriate provisions into the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994.
The Court criticized the authorities for their prolonged inertia despite prior orders and sanctioned plans.
“When an accused is in custody under PMLA irrespective of the case for which he is under custody, any statement under section 50 of PMLA to the same investigating agency is inadmissible against the maker.”
The Court noted that the provisions regarding social audit under the Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, should be invoked cautiously to customize schemes effectively.
“It is expected from a litigant to approach the court with all bonafides and without any ill-motive.”
From his leadership roles during his student days to his significant contributions as an advocate and judge, Justice Suresh Kumar Kait’s journey serves as an inspiration for aspiring legal professionals, especially those from humble beginnings.
In the instant matter, the State Bar Council of MP issued a communication calling on lawyers in the State to abstain from judicial work in order to protest against the High Court’s scheme mandating the disposal of 25 oldest cases every quarter.
“The arrest should be rational, fair and as per law and shall not be merely based upon guilt of accused established from inadmissible evidence.”
The Court added that this directive does not affect ongoing recruitment where examinations have already been conducted.
The wife was appointed as Assistant Manager in LIC Housing Finance Ltd., and at time the respondent was doing nothing, this was the reason why husband compelled the appellant to leave the job and stay with him.
“The enquiry is nothing but an eye wash because the same was conducted without following any procedure which had to be mandatorily followed.”
“Private Respondents are free to reuse generic beer bottles manufactured by third parties which do not violate the label, trademark/brand/logo of another entity.”
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
The applicant bore sole responsibility for any adverse effects arising from the inability to cross-examine the prosecutrix due to repeated delay tactics.
The Court deemed the Coordinate Bench decision in Narmadi Prasad v. State of M.P., as per incuriam, as it did not consider the Aadhaar Card’s intended use solely as identity-only proof.
As per the provisions of Muslim law and the DV Act, the Court opined that the present petitioner being father-in-law of respondent, cannot be compelled to give maintenance to the respondent.
“If any social media platform intends to publish the Court proceedings, that will be permissible only in the manner provided by and subject to restrictions and limitations as per Rule 11(b) of Rules of 2021 and not in any other manner.”
“Indisputably, the public good is a question of fact. Good faith has also to be established as a fact. Ergo, to prove good faith so as to constitute offence of Section 499 of IPC, trial is necessary.”
The Justice Jain Commission Report pertains to the 2017 Mandsaur farmers’ protest, during which police action resulted in five deaths and several injuries.