Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The public’s perception of the judiciary matters just as much as its role in dispute resolution… therefore it is imperative to maintain a high benchmark of honesty, accountability and good conduct.” – Rajesh Kohli v. High Court of J&K, (2010) 12 SCC

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The punishment of dismissal in the present case shocks the conscience of this court because the punishment is shockingly disproportionate.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that “the Superintendent of Police, Seoni is fully cognizant of the seriousness of the matter that has hurt sentiments of public.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The State accepted notice and sought time to obtain instructions as to “why action has not been taken against the anti-social elements who have broken the statue of Dr. Ambedkar on the night of 10-02-2025.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A judicial officer cannot pronounce the concluding portion of his judgment in open court without the entire text of the judgment being prepared/dictated.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

‘Employee and community welfare expenditures incurred under statutory obligations or National Coal Wage Agreements are allowable business expenses under Section 37(1), being commercially expedient.’

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Amounts of retiral dues, including gratuity, are not bounties. It is deferred payment to the employee for the long services rendered by him to the Department… The retiral dues are also recognized as property under the Article 300-A of the Constitution.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

When the Court asked the Senior Advocate about the presence of respondent 5 in Court, instead of responding to the query, he created a ruckus in the Court by shouting at top of his voice, which is recorded in the live-streamed recording of the Court.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

When the Court asked the Senior Advocate about the presence of respondent 5 in Court, instead of responding to the query, he created a ruckus in the Court by shouting at top of his voice, which is recorded in the live-streamed recording of the Court.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The question regarding State’s accountability for missing liquor stock is not a mere contractual dispute

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court took a prima facie view of the matter and issued notice to all respondents.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Since the colleges of the petitioners before this Court did not deposit the fee before the Bar Council of India and it did not renew the recognition, it is not the fault of the candidates and the Bar Council of India should have taken strict action against such institutions.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“A person claiming EWS benefits on account of economic deprivation cannot be said to have faced discrimination on the basis of the caste, which unfortunately, in a casteist society, casts stigma by birth and can never be changed by the person.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Right to life is deeply entrenched in the protection and conservation of environment, forests, and all the natural resources of the State, as a facet of Article 21 read with 48-A of the Constitution of India.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Huge increase in volume of traffic and everyday traffic congestion in both sides of the BRTS Corridor persuaded the Expert Committee to conclude that BRTS Corridor has lost its utility in the present-day scenario.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that failure to comply with Court’s guidelines will amount to contempt of court, and strict contempt proceedings will be initiated against the erring officers under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The instant matter pertains to the disposal of hazardous waste from the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) site.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Revenue Officers, including the Tehsildar, do not have judicial authority to resolve disputes related to wills or non-testamentary documents. These matters must be decided by the Civil Court.”

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The right to peaceful and secure living environment for father-in-law under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act outweighed the son-in-law’s legal ownership or adverse possession claims.

Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Since no research or scientific report has been placed by the petitioner to support the claims, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition.”