IPAB
‘Puma cats and lion belong to same family, Felidae’; Delhi HC cancels ‘leaping lion’ mark of Gajari Online Services Pvt. Ltd in rectification petition filed by PUMA
“The continued use of the impugned mark will affect the purity of the registered trade mark as the same is likely to cause deception and confusion, in terms of Section 11(2) and 11(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.”
Delhi High Court sets aside IPAB order disenfranchising Yashoda Super Speciality Hospital trademark on ground of violation of principles of natural justice
Yashoda Super Speciality Hospital & Heart Institute happens to be one of the leading hospitals in Ghaziabad.
Bombay High Court: Mere existence of the slightest probability of confusion in case of medicinal product marks requires that the use of such mark be restrained
Bombay High Court observed that confusion in the case a medicinal or pharmaceutical product may have disastrous effect on the health.
Delhi High Court initiated criminal contempt proceedings after Registrar’s (Vigilance) inquiry revealed fabricated IPAB Order was placed on record
The Delhi High Court had initiated criminal contempt proceedings against defendants in a suit after the Registrar (Vigilance)’s inquiry revealed that the defendants placed a fabricated Intellectual Property Appellate Board’s Order on record.
Can a generic expression be granted registration and/or protection as a trade mark under trade mark laws? IPAB explains if “N 95” is capable of being registered or protected as a trade mark
Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB): The Bench of Justice Manmohan Singh (Chairman) and Lakshmidevi Somanath (Technical Member, Trademarks) and Makyam Vijay Kumar
Del HC | ‘Technical contribution’ is the test of patentability for computer programs; law on S. 3(k) of Patents Act clarified
Delhi High Court: Pratibha Singh, J., allowed a writ petition filed against the order of Intellectual Property Appellate Board (“IPAB”) whereby it had