GNLU | 6th International Conference on Economic Analysis of Law, Governance and Public Policy
GNLU Centre for Law and Economics, is committed to promoting the interdisciplinary study of law and economics in India, is
GNLU Centre for Law and Economics, is committed to promoting the interdisciplinary study of law and economics in India, is
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Ashok Bhushan*, J., Dr.
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal | While dealing with an appeal challenging the impugned order passed by NCLT, Anant Bijay
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 83
by M.P. Venkateshwara Perumal*
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 7, 8 and 11 — Essential requirements of arbitration agreement: When there is discernible intention
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal: While dealing with a matter seeking expunging the adverse remake made against the appellant, a
National Company Law Tribunal | In an application filed under S. 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, a
An order of attachment when made under the PMLA does not result in the corporate debtor or the Resolution Professional facing a fait accompli.
by Akaant Kumar Mittal†
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 81
Constitution of India — Art. 21 — “Victim” of crime: Scope of rights of “victim” of crime, to participate in
Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling| ‘Combined Wire Rope’ not a part of the fishing vessel, thus, not
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — S. 31(7) and Ss. 17, 21, 23(3), 24(1), 25, 26, 29 and 85(2)(a) —
by Swarnendu Chatterjee+ and Anwesha Pal++
Cite as: 2022 SCC OnLine Blog Exp 75
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — Or. 7 R. 11(d) and Or. 14 R. 2: Limitation as a ground for rejecting
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 — S. 96, Or. 41 Rr. 31 and 33: Principles summarised regarding powers and duty of
“A claim may not be barred by limitation. It is the remedy for realisation of the claim, which gets barred by limitation.”
Supreme Court: The bench of Indira Banerjee* and AS Bopanna, JJ has reversed the NCLAT order wherein it was held that the
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of NV Ramana*, CJ and JK Maheshwari and Hima Kohli, JJ has held that the Insolvency and
by Shyam Kapadia† and Dhruva Gandhi†