Explained| Can proceedings against a charge-sheeted accused be quashed if other suspects have not been charge-sheeted?
Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that merely because some of the persons who might
Supreme Court: The bench of MR Shah and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that merely because some of the persons who might
Supreme Court: Explaining the principles of sentencing policy, the 3-judge bench of NV Ramana, CJ and Surya Kant* and AS Bopanna, JJ
“Although furlough can be claimed without a reason, the prisoner does not have an absolute legal right to claim furlough.”
In Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra, (1984) 4 SCC 116, the bench of S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, A. Varadarajan and Sabyasachi
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, JJ has lucidly laid down the principles governing
The settlement agreement subsumes the original complaint.
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Vikram Nath and BV Nagarathna, JJ has held that a Preliminary Enquiry is
‘Spare the rod and spoil the child’ an old saying may have lost its relevance in present days and Corporal punishment to the child is not recognised by law but that does not mean that a teacher or school authorities have to shut their eyes to any indiscipline act of a student.
Summoning of an accused in a criminal case is a serious matter. Criminal law cannot be set into motion as a matter of course.
Supreme Court: In a case where a man was allegedly murdered by his wife and colleague, the bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*
In a case where a compromise was reached between parties, 28 years after an incident left the victim crippled for life, the Court said that such a brutality cannot be ignored which is not against the individual but the crime is against the society which has to be dealt with sternly.
The two proceedings, criminal and departmental, are entirely different. They operate in different fields and have different objectives.
“The power cannot be exercised in a casual and cavalier manner.”
Supreme Court: In a case where a man was convicted for killing his wife on the suspicion of her infidelity and was
Supreme Court: The bench of KM Joseph and S. Ravindra Bhat*, JJ has reiterated the factors to be considered while deciding the
Supreme Court: In a case where the detenu was accused of committing a series of criminal offences from October, 2017 to December,
Supreme Court: A Division Bench of Dr D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah, JJ. upheld the order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvananthapuram,
Jammu and Kashmir High Court: The Division Bench of Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Puneet Gupta, JJ., dismissed the application seeking suspension of
Madhya Pradesh High Court: Atul Sreedharan, J., allowed a bail application of the applicant who was charged for offences under sections 420,467,468,471,472,474
“Granting of such blanket order would not only adversely affect the investigation but would have far reaching implications for maintaining the Rule of Law.”