![madras high court](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/madras-high-court-440x293.webp)
Criminal Investigation
![madras high court](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/madras-high-court-440x293.webp)
![Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/MicrosoftTeams-image-494-440x293.png)
Reopening of the assessment is indemonstrable in law as reasons inserted in Section 147 IT Act were not considered as evidence: ITAT
It is a trite law that the reasons, as recorded for reopening the reassessment, are to be examined on a standalone basis to determine the validity of proceedings under section 147 IT Act.
![Justice Dipankar Datta](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/MicrosoftTeams-image-460-392x293.jpg)
Know Thy Newly Appointed Supreme Court Judge- Justice Dipankar Datta
Former Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice Dipankar Datta, was sworn in as a Supreme Court Judge. His appointment now raises the judicial strength of the Supreme Court to 28 out of total strength of 34 judges
![Bombay High Court](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Bombay-HC-440x293.jpg)
Bombay High Court | Criminal proceedings cannot be proceeded with if accused was exonerated in departmental proceedings based on identical/similar charges
Bombay High Court: The Division Bench of S.B. Shukre and G. A. Sanap, JJ. allowed an application setting aside an FIR for
![](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Identification-440x293.jpg)
Questioning the feasibility of the Criminal Procedure (Identification) Act, 2022
by Prof. (Dr.) G.S. Bajpai† and Sahajveer Baweja††
![](https://www.scconline.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/DSC_7472-2-e1476682209224-440x293.jpg)
Bloomberg Privacy Case | Whether a person under criminal investigation can have a reasonable expectation of privacy? UKSC explains
United Kingdom Supreme Court: The Bench of Lord Reed, President and Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Hamblen and Lord Stephens, held that