CIAL

CIAL is public authority
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court concluded that all three limbs of Section 2(h)(d)(i) of the RTI Act — ownership, control, and substantial financing, stood satisfied in the case of CIAL. Hence, CIAL was held to be a “public authority” within the meaning of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and was amenable to the obligations of information disclosure under the provisions and rigours of the Act.

district consumer disputes redressal commission
Case BriefsTribunals/Commissions/Regulatory Bodies

The Commission held that CIAL’s inadequate rain coverage while boarding flight caused a great deal of agony to the complainant as he got drenched in the rain and suffered fever for 3 days.