Invoice branding not enough calcutta hc
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The conduct anterior to the levy may give rise to suspicion but it cannot, by itself, discharge the burden of proving that the goods actually removed after 1st March 2003 bore a brand name. Suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Punjab and Haryana High Court:  Augustine George Masih, J. upheld the decision of the lower court as there was no evidence on

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: While deciding a criminal appeal preferred against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, a Bench comprising of