Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
The NHRC has issued notices to the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police, Karnataka, calling for a detailed report on the matter within two weeks.
Continue reading
In the present case, the issue was whether CCI has power to examine the case, where the subject matter was protected by the Patent Act. The Tribunal observed that Section 3(5) of the Competition Act, 2002 states that the Competition Act will not restrict the right of any person in protecting his rights under the Patent Act.
Continue reading
The DCDRC said that it is expected from IRCTC to maintain certain standards and to check the quality of food that is being served to the consumers while travelling.
Continue reading
Reaffirming the principle that transactions in securities fall outside the ambit of GST, the Gujarat Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that ITC on share buyback expenses is inadmissible and must be reversed under Section 17(3) of the CGST Act, 2017.
Continue reading
The NHRC sought detailed reports from the Director Generals of Police of all three states within two weeks.
Continue reading
The NHRC issued notice to the State DGP, calling for a detailed report on the matter within two weeks.
Continue reading
A notice under Section 148-A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued to the assessee, stating that income had escaped assessment under the provisions of Section 147, regarding sale, purchase of properties and contractual receipts.
Continue reading
“It is the duty of the online platform, which is offering such services, to ensure that correct product is delivered by the seller who is having business to business contract with them”.
Continue reading
The NHRC issued notices to the Chief Secretary and the Director General of Police, Government of Rajasthan, calling for a detailed report on the matter within two weeks.
Continue reading
“Consideration out of surrender of tenancy right on account of immovable property cannot be considered as service as per definition under Section 65-B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994 and no service tax is payable.”
Continue reading
“The alleged conduct of concerted practice by NSE and BSE of prescribing standard agreement flows from the regulatory architecture and therefore, does not attract the provision of Section 3(3) of the Competition Act, 2002.”
Continue reading
In a preliminary inquiry, it was prima facie observed that Drishti IAS had allegedly published the claim/advertisement and simultaneously advertised various types of courses provided by them on its official website while concealing important information. Therefore DG (Investigation) was requested to look into the matter.
Continue reading
The appellant was not registered with Gujarat Pollution Control Board for processing goods like Lead Acid Batteries and so they were clearing these goods to their buyers who had license from Pollution Control Board to process old/used Lead Acid Batteries for extraction of lead scrap.
Continue reading
The power envisaged under Section 34(4)(b) of the IBC is a power to recommend the replacement of the particular Resolution Professional on facts specific to that individual and is not a general power that could be exercised by the IBBI for issuing the Circular.
Continue reading
With respect to noticee’s liability as a partner, the noticee submitted that she resigned within short span of time and did not receive any remuneration or profit from the firm. Further, she was not a part of decisions or involved in day-to-day affairs of the firm.
Continue reading
“Mere entries in income tax returns or Form 26AS cannot, by themselves, establish liability under the Finance Act, 1994, unless corroborated by evidence demonstrating rendition of taxable service.”
Continue reading
Registration under Section 22 of the CGST Act is linked to the place from where taxable supplies originate and not the mere existence of a warehousing unit in another State. The AAR clarified that storage in an FTWZ does not create an additional liability to register.
Continue reading
Non-renewal of the Informant’s license for space on the airside of Rajiv Gandhi International Airport does not have the potential to limit and restrict the provision of Line Maintenance Services, so as to cause prejudice to the consumers and hence, is not in contravention of Section 4(2)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002.
Continue reading
A settlement of dispute is clearly not an agreement to tolerate any act or situation. It is beyond the scope of Section 66-E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994 and thus not a ‘declared service’.
Continue reading
“Despite the contentions raised by the Appellant, Appellant entered into settlement with the Operational Creditor to discharge his dues, which has been filed by an Affidavit by the Appellant as well as Respondent.”
Continue reading