Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The appointing authority has no discretion to refuse withdrawal if the request is made before the notice period lapses and before the retirement has actually taken effect. The employee cannot be treated as functus officio during the notice period”.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The fact that IndiaMART provides an option for a seller to choose the brand of its products specifically describing its goods cannot, prima facie, be held to be a ground to hold that it aids and abets the infringer in displaying the counterfeit products of a particular brand.”

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“No doubt, Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech and expression, this freedom is subject to the reasonable restrictions, and it does not include the freedom to make statements which are defamatory to any person or defamatory to the Indian Army.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is not the job of any trained law enforcer, skilled in the efficient use of force continuum to mete out unmerciful, furious beatings to a common man on the drop of the hat and disrespect civilians, wielding their authority to disregard and disrupt law and order themselves.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the complainant (‘victim’) and her mother, were currently exploring matrimonial prospects, and that the pendency of a criminal case might result as a serious impediment to her future opportunities and personal relationships.

Continue reading
Rs 2 Lakh indemnity clause restrictive covenant
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Vijaya Bank while issuing the appointment letter to the respondent, included a restrictive covenant carrying an indemnity clause, wherein the respondent had to pay the Bank if he leaves the service before completion of 3 years.

Continue reading
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is more than settled that there is no equity in taxation law and equity would only come into play in case there is no law operating in the field. For it is well settled that whenever conflict is between the law and equity, law would prevail.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case Briefs

The plaintiffs submitted that the RITZ and RITZ-CARLTON marks are widely recognized and known among Indian consumers, especially in the hospitality and travel industry. The plaintiffs have promoted their respective trade marks heavily and have been recognized and given multiple awards and accolades.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court highlighted that some of the petitioners have scored good percentile and further, some of them are even from the marginalised sections of the society. They will be deprived of participation in counselling and consequent admission to the course and institute of their choice for reasons beyond their control, as the result of class 12 is yet to be declared by NIOS.

Continue reading
Rajasthan High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is not for the Court, while exercising extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to decide which site would be more suitable for setting up the sewage treatment plant. This necessarily has to be done by the Government and its Authorities.”

Continue reading