Madras High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Arulmigu Gangaikonda Cholisvarar temple is a protected monument under the Archaeological Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1958.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court opined that the law related to advertisements in any form — print, digital, or TVC will also extend to ‘in-mall’ marketing campaigns since it is a method of promotion and marketing of company’s product to a consumer.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Considering the facts of the present petition, this Court is of the considered opinion that interest of justice would be served if the information as sought by the petitioner is provided”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“To ensure the implementation of the said recommendations, this Court directs the Chief Secretary, GNCTD to convene monthly meetings till all the recommendations get implemented and action taken report shall be filed by the Chief Secretary, GNCTD on or before 15-10-2024.”

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court held that there was no justification for granting separate recognition to the petitioner association when the welfare schemes for advocates were already being administered through recognized bar associations.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The magnitude of the problem is humongous, which has been compounded by the abject failure of the concerned authorities and the respondents to take timely action, despite repeated directions of this Court.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

If the medical profession is based on a foundation of false information, then certainly it would be a blot on the noble profession. Therefore, the foundation of any student should not be built based on false information and suppression of the facts.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The award is not required to be set aside until and unless it is vitiated by “patent illegality” appearing on the face of the record with a caveat that the award should not be set aside merely on the ground of erroneous application of law or by appreciation of evidence.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that since Enforcement Case Investigation Report (‘ECIR’) is not a condition precedent for starting an investigation or inquiry by the Enforcement Directorate and is only an internal record of the department, its quashing would serve no purpose whatsoever.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that petitioners have filed the present petition even though the representation made to the Election Commission of India is stated to be under consideration.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Applicants, i.e., Nara Chandrababu Naidu, and Nakka Ananda Babu, refused to cooperate during their transfer to Central Jail Aurangabad and created terrorizing atmosphere, hurled abuses in Telugu and English and used criminal force and even assaulted the police constables.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that if an authority is empowered to name a revenue area under a statutory provision, there are no reasons to deny the power for altering the names of a revenue area to such an authority.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Court’s jurisdiction at the pre-reference stage is only to determine the prime facie existence of an arbitration agreement and the final adjudication, even on the question of limitation, is to be left to the arbitral tribunal, being the parties’ chosen forum.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Court said evidence shows a consensual relationship between two adults where promise to marry may not have been motivating factor for sexual relationship.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Statehas miserably failed to show any patent illegality warranting interference in appellate jurisdiction. Mere allegation would not suffice until and unless it stands substantiated from the pleading and the records.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court said that when confronted with a question pertaining the custody of a minor child, the Court as parens partriae, should not decide on the consideration of the legal rights of the parties, but on the sole and predominant criterion of the child’s best interest and welfare.

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court stated that despite opportunities, the respondent failed to offer a genuine apology or show remorse for his actions.

Continue reading
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Madhya Pradesh High Court stated that “throwing a 13-month-old child on the floor by itself would amount to an attempt to murder and throwing a paperweight towards his head would further aggravate the situation.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The respect and protection of a woman and of maternity should be raised to the position of an inalienable social duty and should become one of the principles of human morality.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Plaintiff’s X mark is derived from their ‘SPARX’ logo and has been used in a standalone form in relation to its footwear products sold under the ‘SPARX’ brand. Plaintiff’s grievance is against the defendants who started using defendants’ X mark, which was deceptively similar, for footwear as well, being identical goods.

Continue reading