Madhya Pradesh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The petitioner has unnecessarily given the negative publicity of this matter against the Panchayat has resulted into delay of sale of the shops.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“While liberty and dignity of an individual must be held high, however, no one can be permitted to subvert and cause devolution in the process of justice.”

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the present case, since the charas and ganja seized from the accused were of small quantities, the question to be decided by the Court is whether the mushroom and magic mushroom capsules together can be considered as commercial quantity.

Continue reading
Chhattisgarh High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that admittedly, before the respondent’s retirement, neither any departmental inquiry was initiated against him nor was any show cause notice issued to him.

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“In matters of recruitment to services, interference to the process of recruitment when otherwise conducted in a transparent, fair and reasonable manner with no allegation of malafides cannot be gone into in the limited power of judicial review of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The investigating agency must instead rely on independent and lawful methods to gather information rather than pressuring the accused to act against their constitutional safeguards. Insisting on custodial interrogation solely for self-incriminatory purposes is unconstitutional and sets a dangerous precedent.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

By Resolution dated 12-04-2017, Permanent Selection and Appointment Committee of the High Court had resolved that for determining quota prescribed under Rule 5 of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008, actual working strength of Judges in that cadre as on 31st March of every year had to be taken into consideration.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“To trivialize a case of murder on the ground that the accused and the victim, being husband and wife, had an altercation and therefore, the husband being drunk at the spur of the moment, had killed her, is not only unacceptable but also shocking.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is in the wisdom of the Investigating officer to file charge-sheet against those accused against whom there is strong evidence. Unnecessary harassment and false implication should be avoided.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The husband’s contention that the present case is not a case where the wife is hospitalised due to cruelty or harassment committed upon her, is not only unmerited but also cross the threshold of having a mentality that in a serious Section 498-A IPC cases, the woman should have injuries and medical treatment record of a hospital.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Applying the ‘eye of the needle’ test, the Court has no hesitation in observing that the prima facie scrutiny of the facts of the present case, leads to a clear conclusion that there is not even a vestige of doubt that the claim is non-arbitrable.”

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The case concerns the premature release of an individual as recommended by the State Sentence Review Board, however, the release process stalled due to pending formalities with the Judicial Department.

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

In the matter at hand, the Family Court ordered for payment of Rs. 3,000/- maintenance. The High Court noted that without producing any proof of the infidelity of his wife, the husband simply character assassinated his wife.

Continue reading
Tripura High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The data furnished by the TSLSA are indeed alarming. And more so, since youth in a particular age group are being found to be affected by this life threatening disease.”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Technicality cannot be attached with a notice served under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as that would defeat the objective of the statute, which provides for a speedy resolution of the disputes.”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Social media platforms, print media, other digital/non-digital mediums and other relevant intermediaries are also restrained from publishing, sharing, hosting, circulating, or promoting any further defamatory content about plaintiff.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bona fide tourists/travellers, travelling for social engagements in India with gold, which could be of a much higher value than the permissible limits, cannot to be expected to file detailed declarations, as this can make the entire process of entering India and exiting from airports extremely unfriendly or onerous.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The action for suspension, removal, or dismissal of the trustee under Section 41-D of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 (‘the MPT Act’) is an independent action having no connection with the enquiry to be conducted under Section 22 of the MPT Act.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The record shows that the petitioner (‘accused’) has committed heinous offences while he was on bail in other cases; and he has been convicted in the offences committed while on bail. When there is a long list of serious criminal involvements, the apprehension that the accused suffers from recidivism cannot be dismissed as imaginary.”

Continue reading
Orissa High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The affidavit raising the preliminary objection stated- That as the two Judges of Larger Bench have already disagreed with the view of the earlier Division Bench, their presence in the Full Bench will be a hindrance for an independent and open mind hearing. The point of law/question of law referred to be determined cannot be fair and unbiased. That, in this premises, the view of a third Judge will be immaterial as the disagreed view of the two judges will prevail. It is just like loosing of the case by the sole respondent is preordained.”

Continue reading