HIGH COURTS JULY 2023 WEEKLY ROUNDUP| Stories on Rights of HIV Patients; 2002 Godhra Riots; WB Teachers’ Recruitment Scam and many more| SCC Blog
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Continue reading
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Continue reading
The Supreme Court was hearing Rahul Gandhi’s plea challenging Gujarat High Court’s order dismissing his application to stay two years conviction Order.
Continue reading
The Court observed that a person gets caste by birth and remains forever unless there are circumstances indicative of the individual having embraced not only a new order but being outcasted from the original order.
Continue reading
The Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Ordinance, 2023 was promulgated just eight days after the Constitution Bench had decided on the issue of administrative control over transfers and postings of civil servants in the NCTD.
Continue reading
The coal scam in Chhattisgarh was pertaining to the allocation of ‘Fatehpur East’ coal block in favour of JLD Yavatmal Energy Private Limited.
Continue reading
The Will was executed by the testator, Late Raja Bahadur Sardar Singh of Khetri in the presence of two attesting witnesses, thus, complying with Section 63 of the Succession Act, 1925.
Continue reading
by Balram Pandey*
Continue reading
The Gujarat High Court had previously dismissed Teesta’s application for regular bail and directed her to surrender immediately.
Continue reading
The Court applied the doctrine of harmonious construction and observed that granting of parole would not amount to any intervention in pending proceedings before Supreme Court under Section 389 of CrPC
Continue reading
In case the certificate was lying in the vehicle at the time it was repossessed, the impugned order directing for the vehicle to be registered in the name of the financier would not cause any prejudice nor could be said to be contrary to any provisions of law.
Continue reading
The Director of Seashore Group of Companies was seeking Transfer of Criminal Cases pending against before various Courts to CBI Court as the CBI Court had clubbed other 22 FIRs pending against him.
Continue reading
Two Benches of the Supreme Court had expressed their disagreement with the view taken in Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV), therefore, the matter was referred to larger Bench.
Continue reading
The Tribunal regarded the hike in violation of Section 61(d) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and against the larger public interest, which is one of the critical factors to be taken into consideration in deciding whether to grant interim relief.
Continue reading
The Court stated that if at all an offence is committed at a particular time, there cannot be inconsistency in the time of offence in the deposition and the FIR registered by the informant herself.
Continue reading
The Additional Sessions Judge had sentenced the Rape Convict to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence under section 376(1) of the IPC.
Continue reading
A chargesheet was filed against the Juvenile Delinquent for offences under Sections 363, 366-A, 368, 376 of the IPC and Section 3, 4, 16 and 17 of the JJ Act.
Continue reading
“Private unaided schools are also amenable to Writ Jurisdiction as they carry out public function discharged by the State under Article 12 of the Constitution.“
Continue reading
The Complainant had filed a second FIR against the accused just after the parties had arrived at a settlement before the Court and the first FIR against the accused was quashed.
Continue reading
The Court found that none of the acts of the convict would come within the definition of ‘rape’ under Section 375 of the IPC or ‘penetrative sexual assault’ under Section 3 of the POCSO Act.
Continue reading
If plaint filed in different courts are read juxtaposing each other it cannot be concluded that similar and identical issues are involved in both the cases.
Continue reading