Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that State authorities cannot retain the excess amount which is not in accordance with law and the same would be violative of Article 265 of the Constitution.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Since the rival trade marks were visually and phonetically identical, it would cause confusion and deception amongst the general public, doctors, and chemists.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court perused the opinion of the Medical Board, which reflects that colour vision of the petitioner was normal and he was fit to be employed on the post in question.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Any third party claiming an interest in the domain name, without being bound by the INDRP, cannot allege that the award has been rendered in violation of principles of natural justice.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that granting such relief would cause injustice to other applicants who were similarly situated as the petitioner and who could not submit their applications by the prescribed deadline.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court referred to Jolly George Varghese v. Bank of Cochin, (1980) 2 SCC 360 quoting Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer that “to be poor, in this land of Daridranayan, is no crime, and to recover debts by the procedure of putting one in prison is too flagrantly violative of Article 21 unless there is proof of the minimal fairness of his wilful failure to pay in spite of his sufficient means”.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court finds reconsideration of respondent 1’s application for registration of the trade mark ‘CLARIWASH’ registered 14 years ago, on account of procedural error manifestly unfair.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that since the only allegation against the entity was that it was found to be non-existent, it was at liberty to furnish documents and material to support its contention that it continues to be a valid tax entity.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court opined that the applicant has a bright future and is apprehensive of the stigma of conviction that may ruin his future, therefore, it was expedient to release him on probation under the Section 4 benefit

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court reiterated the findings of the Supreme Court in State of Maharashtra v. Milind, (2001) 1 SCC 4, that the benefits drawn by a candidate not belonging to a scheduled tribe, must be considered to having been drawn on the basis of a false caste certificate; such benefits are required to be withdrawn.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The impugned order is a stereotype order which is passed in almost every case by the State Government without application of mind.”

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Parliament, after considering a spate of reports highlighting the flourishing human organ trade in India and the consequential exploitation of the economically vulnerable segments of the society through organ removal, and illegal transplants, for prohibiting the unethical practice, enacted the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994”

Continue reading
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that apart from one WhatsApp message, which was not incriminating, nothing else was found from the raid at the petitioner house. Still the petitioner has been behind bars for a substantial period of more than 2½ years.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court stated that ‘Electro Homeopathy’ is not a recognized form of medicine, and its analysis does not fall within the jurisdictional purview of Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia Laboratory.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“When the liberty of a person is imperiled, immediate action should be taken by the relevant authorities”

Continue reading
Reserve Bank of India
Legislation UpdatesNotifications

The 2024 Master Directions are principle-based and have been issued to strengthen the role of the Board in overall governance as well as oversight of fraud risk management in Regulated Entities.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court said that the scope of interference with arbitral awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has now become heavily circumscribed.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Delhi High Court granted time to both parties to file written submissions on whether an arbitration clause in an invoice could constitute an arbitration agreement under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court said that though the petitioner-school was very negligent in filing the details of students appearing for supplementary/compartment examination within stipulated time. However, the Court cannot allow the student to suffer loss of an academic year.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Consequent on introduction of sub-Section 6(A) in Section 11, the Supreme Court has in several decisions held that the jurisdiction of the referral Court is now circumscribed.”

Continue reading