Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Section 34, quite apart from its classically limited scope, is certainly not intended to be used as a tool for a litigant to desist from participating in the arbitral proceedings, despite being fully aware thereof, and, thereafter, seek a second bite at the arbitral cherry.”

Continue reading
Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It was said that since all sub-sections of Section 354A of IPC start with the words ‘a man’, a female accused would not be covered under this Section.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Export Promotion Council of India is merely a facilitator in promoting exports of pharmaceutical products, and the RMCC is a facilitator for the Customs officials in the enhancement of security; the non-provision of the Notification by them was not a justification for the applicant’s non-compliance.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

A woman’s decision in whether or not to go ahead with the termination of her pregnancy is a decision that is to be taken by no one but herself. This is primarily based on the widely acknowledged idea of bodily autonomy. Here, her consent reigns supreme.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court refrained from commenting on the merits of the contentions of either party, as trial was pending in the matter.

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Effacing abominable offences through quashing process would not only send a wrong signal to the community, but may also accord an undue benefit to unscrupulous habitual or professional offenders, who can secure a “settlement” through duress, threats, social boycotts, bribes or other dubious means”

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Even if it is to be accepted that there is no provision enabling change of religion entered in school certificates, that is no reason to tie down a person to one religion, merely by reason of his birth”

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that Section 90 of IPC does not define the term “consent”, but the law does not see “consent derived from a fear of injury and misconception of fact” as consent.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is a series which appears to be more in the genre of comedy, and merely describes the main character as a topper in Chartered Accountancy Examination. It is neither intended nor can be perceived to be derogatory to the profession of Chartered Accountancy.”

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It was said that when a mark as distinctive and well-known as “Adidas” is copied, it can dilute the mark’s distinctiveness and harm the brand’s reputation, irrespective of the differences in the product categories.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Due to the respondent 1’s brazen disregard for the status quo order, the Court in absence of a Section 17 remedy, had to grant an interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The formation of opinion under Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 is in the exercise of supervisory powers of Central Information Commission and not in the exercise of the adjudicatory powers.

Continue reading
Allahabad High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The action of the Lucknow University in not only in violation of principle of nature justice but has deleterious effect on the future of the candidate and such an action is deplorable.”

Continue reading
Kerala High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Marriage should be a union based on mutual respect, love, and understanding. When one spouse seeks freedom from a relationship that has become a source of distress, denying this request only perpetuates suffering and contradicts the very essence of a marital bond”

Continue reading
fake representation as Supreme Court lawyer
Case BriefsDistrict Court

The Court stated that the accused had not only cheated the public at large but also attempted to disrespect the noble legal profession.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court noted that the appellate authority formed under BPCL’s Policy remedy would have comprised of their officers, and the same could not be permitted as BPCL could not be a judge in their own cause.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

It is the bounden duty of the employer to be sensitive and responsive to the physical difficulties that a working lady would face in performing her duties at the workplace while carrying a baby or bringing up the child post birth.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The brand ‘Peter England’ was introduced in 1997 and later acquired by Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. in 2000.

Continue reading
Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Court emphasised that in our conservative society, even on account of family enmity, the future and career of a girl is not jeopardised, and such is a strong circumstance in favour of the prosecution.

Continue reading
Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“There is not even a single scrap of a document placed on record by the appellant/society to show any kind of legitimacy it exercises, either over the land or the illegal structure built thereon.”

Continue reading