Bhumika Indulia, Author at SCC Times

Petition in nature of second revision not a proper case in which inherent power could be invoked under Section 482 CrPC

Madhya Pradesh High Court: This Criminal Case was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Rajendra Kumar Srivastava, J., by petitioner under

Cases Reported SCC Weekly

2018 SCC Vol. 10 December 14, 2018 Part 3

Constitution of India — Arts. 16(4-A) and 16(4-B), 330, 341 and 342 — Effectuation of Arts. 16(4-A) and 16(4-B): First precondition for

Case Briefs High Courts

Unless exceptional or extraordinary circumstances arise no application should be entertained once trial is concluded

Orissa High Court: A Single Judge Bench of Dr A.K.Rath, J., dismissed the petition that was filed against an order of the

Case Briefs Foreign Courts

An expression even if hurtful to people’s feelings or downright offensive is protected under Section 16(1) of Constitution of South Africa

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa: This appeal was filed before a 5-Judge Bench of Dambuza, JA., Lewis, Wallis and Zondi,

Hot Off The Press News

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) celebrates its 70th anniversary

“Where, after all, do universal human rights begin? In small places, close to home – so close and so small that they

Case Briefs High Courts

Reneging on a promise of marriage does not render a consensual sexual relationship as rape: J&K HC quashes malicious FIR filed to wreak vengeance on the accused

Jammu & Kashmir High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Sanjay Kumar Gupta, J. quashed an FIR forrape, holding the same

Law School News Moot Court Achievements & Reports

RMLNLU wins runners up trophy at 4th National ADR (Negotiation) Competition, 2019

The RMLNLU team comprising of Rahul Kumar and Kratika Indurkhya emerged as Runners up in 4th National ADR (Negotiation) Competition, 2019. The

Case Briefs High Courts

1984 Sikh Riots| “Principal Offender” Sajjan Kumar sentenced to life imprisonment for “crime against humanity”

“The mass killings of Sikhs in Delhi and elsewhere in November 1984 were in fact ‘crimes against humanity’. They will continue to

Law School News Moot Court Announcements

9th School of Law, CHRIST National Moot Court Competition 2019 [Register by Jan 10, 2019]

Reported by Anirudh Kulkarni

Case Briefs High Courts

Appeal against an order allowed as the party obtaining the order gave up interest therein

Madras High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of N. Seshasayee, J., allowed an appeal on the ground that the respondent gave

Case Briefs High Courts

Disallowing to finish the construction of a portion of a complete building serves no purpose: Punjab and Haryana HC

Punjab and Haryana High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anil Kshetarpal, J. disposed of a revision petition by allowing construction

Case Briefs High Courts

Installation of pipeline is of no use if the residents are deprived of drinking water: Uttaranchal HC

Uttaranchal High Court: A Division Bench comprising of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Lok Pal Singh, J. directed the respondents to inform the

Case Briefs High Courts

Claim already raised before competent court not to be interfered by High Court especially when no ground for the same is found

Madhya Pradesh High Court: This writ was filed before a Single Judge Bench of Sheel Nagu, J., in nature of mandamus. The

Case Briefs High Courts

Court’s interference under Section 482 CrPC requires satisfaction to the effect that no criminal offence is made out on the basis of evidence on record: Patna HC

Patna High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the

Case Briefs High Courts

Rejection or renewal of arms licence must be based only on the grounds given under Section 14 of the Arms Act, 1959: Kerala HC

Kerala High Court: A Single Judge Bench comprising of Anu Sivaraman, J. allowed a civil writ petition seeking quashing of an order

Case Briefs High Courts

SCC Times

Petition in nature of second revision not a proper case in which inherent power could be invoked under Section 482 CrPC

2018 SCC Vol. 10 December 14, 2018 Part 3

Unless exceptional or extraordinary circumstances arise no application should be entertained once trial is concluded

An expression even if hurtful to people’s feelings or downright offensive is protected under Section 16(1) of Constitution of South Africa

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) celebrates its 70th anniversary

Reneging on a promise of marriage does not render a consensual sexual relationship as rape: J&K HC quashes malicious FIR filed to wreak vengeance on the accused

RMLNLU wins runners up trophy at 4th National ADR (Negotiation) Competition, 2019

1984 Sikh Riots| “Principal Offender” Sajjan Kumar sentenced to life imprisonment for “crime against humanity”

9th School of Law, CHRIST National Moot Court Competition 2019 [Register by Jan 10, 2019]

Appeal against an order allowed as the party obtaining the order gave up interest therein

Disallowing to finish the construction of a portion of a complete building serves no purpose: Punjab and Haryana HC

Installation of pipeline is of no use if the residents are deprived of drinking water: Uttaranchal HC

Claim already raised before competent court not to be interfered by High Court especially when no ground for the same is found

Court’s interference under Section 482 CrPC requires satisfaction to the effect that no criminal offence is made out on the basis of evidence on record: Patna HC

Rejection or renewal of arms licence must be based only on the grounds given under Section 14 of the Arms Act, 1959: Kerala HC

Rape accused acquitted in light of WhatsApp chat between him and prosecutrix

SC explains High Court’s jurisdiction in regard to scope of deciding a “Note for clarification of Minutes”

ILS Pune | Workshop on “ADR Methods with Focus on Commercial Arbitration and Mediation”

Quashing of complaint refused as husband failed to prove that cases filed by wife were frivolous

Madras HC considers irretrievable breakdown of marriage as a valid ground for divorce