Why Is Article 25 Subject to the Other Provisions of Part III? Indira Jaising Raises a Key Constitutional Question Before the Supreme Court

Article 25 subject to other provisions of Part III

Why does Article 25 say it is ‘subject to the other provisions of Part III’?”

Before the Supreme Court, Senior Advocate Indira Jaising highlighted that the Constituent Assembly Debates contain no discussion explaining the inclusion of this phrase, leaving its meaning open to constitutional interpretation.

Watch the exchange on a question that could have significant implications for the relationship between religious freedom and other fundamental rights.

Join the discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.