Whether the findings of the Supreme Court were binding onthe Single Judge under Article 141 and 144 Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Published on April 1, 2023October 16, 2025By Bhumika Indulia Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window) Telegram More Click to print (Opens in new window) Print Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Related Leave a comment
Appointments & Transfers, News Supreme Court designates 7 former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates
Legislation Updates, Notifications Profession Tax: Maharashtra Grants One-Time Relaxation for March 2026 Deadlines
Case Briefs, Supreme Court Interest earned on deposit by itself doesn’t establish a ‘commercial purpose’ under Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court
Law School News, Others Call for Participation | 1st NLUJ-CCLRP National Essay Writing Competition, 2026
Conference/Seminars/Lectures, Law School News NALSAR Announces M.K. Nambyar Memorial Lecture Series 2026 by University of Colombo’s Prof. Dinesha Samararatne
Case Briefs, High Courts Bombay HC affirms RBI’s revival plan of Punjab and Maharashtra Co-operative Bank —Unity Small Finance Bank amalgamation scheme