Rules 3 & 3-A of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 perfectly valid
Supreme Court: Upholding the Constitutional validity of the provisions of Rule 3 and Rule 3-A of Chapter XXIV of the Allahabad High
Supreme Court
Arithmetical approach in allowing recall of witness can be dangerous
Supreme Court: In the matter where the accused persons has sought for recall of the witnesses under Section 311 read with Section
Union of India, MCI issued notice regarding prescription of guidelines for Private Hospitals to curb medical negligence
Supreme Court: In the case relating to medical negligence where it was contended that the treating physician should have been well advised
Regulation 9(2) of the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 giving incentive to the in-service candidates who had worked in remote and difficult areas, constitutional
Supreme Court: In a Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for a declaration that the third
Bar under Article 233(2) of the Constitution only applies to ‘appointment’ and not to participation in ‘selection’ process
Supreme Court: Exploring the true purport of Art. 233(2) of the Constitution of India where the question to be decided was that
Order directing payment of full back wages to Class III & IV employees modified in the light of the immense financial burden it would cause to LIC
Supreme Court: In the revision petition filed against the order directing LIC to pay full back wages to it’s employees, the Court
No discretion is vested in the prescribed authority to re-determine surplus land by means of Section 31 of the 1976 Amendment Act
Supreme Court: The Court was called upon to the decide the question as to whether ceiling proceedings under U.P. Imposition of Ceiling
Journalists involved in the ‘extortion’ to give voice sample of only the words and not sentences from the disputed conversation
Supreme Court: In the controversy arising due to the voice samples taken in the matter where the appellants had allegedly demanded a
Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 supersedes any inconsistent provisions in Chapter IV
Supreme Court: Hearing the reference made to resolve the conflict in the decisions reported in Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Bangalore Vs.
Multiple life sentences awarded for multiple murders in a single trial cannot run consecutively
Supreme Court: Deciding an interesting question of law as to whether consecutive life sentences can be awarded to a convict on being
Cricket does not flourish due to Ministers and Public Servants holding offices in State Associations or BCCI
Supreme Court: The bench comprising of T.S. Thakur CJI and FM Ibrahim Kalifulla J. accepts Justice RM Lodha panel’s recommendations almost in toto
Constitution bench to decide the matter of establishing 4 regional Courts of Appeal to tackle the issue of pending cases
Supreme Court: In the PIL that sought for possible structural reforms in the Indian Judicial System, the bench of T.S. Thakur, CJ,
SEBI has to ensure that no financial scams take place
Supreme Court: Looking into the matter reflecting the manner of getting excessive number of shares in an irregular manner, adversely affecting the
Mechanical approach in relying on dying declaration needs to be avoided
Supreme Court: Asking the Courts to be careful while dealing with dying declarations, the Court held that a mechanical approach in relying
Tenant can continue to occupy the leased premises even after expiration of agricultural lease on the basis of ‘holding over’ principle
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Ranjan Gogoi, Arun Mishra and P.C.Pant, JJ, were hearing a reference to decide the question as
Husband and Father-in-law held guilty for the murder of a young bride on the basis of circumstantial evidence
Supreme Court: While examining the circumstantial evidences in case of brutal murder of a young bride, the bench comprising of Prafulla C.
Property of person who died during the pendency of trial cannot be attached
Supreme Court: Holding that the property of a person who died during pendency of trial for misappropriation could not be attached by
Summary Courts Martial is an exception and reasons to convene must be specified by Commanding Officer
Supreme Court: Deciding the question as to whether a Summary Court Martial (SCM) can be convened, constituted and completed by the Commanding
Railway Authorities not free from blame where roof riders are killed/injured due to speeding trains
Supreme Court: Showing distress over the incident that occurred in 2011 where At least 14 young men were crushed and 20 others
Consent of the owner of the premises not necessary for renewal of tenant’s valid licence under the Section 492(3) of the Kerala Municipality Act, 1994
Supreme Court: The bench of V. Gopala Gowda and A.K. Goel, JJ, while deciding the question as to whether the consent of