Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Amitabh Bachchan for protection of his publicity rights against the fake Kaun

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case where Tata Sia Airlines Limited filed an application under Order 39 Rules 1 and

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a trade mark infringement case where the ex-parte ad-interim order of injunction was challenged, the Single

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case where application was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case where Club Factory was involved in the sale of various unauthorized/ counterfeited products, bearing

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The trademark RAJNIGANDHA has been declared as a well-known mark by this Court and is entitled to a high degree of protection. The impugned mark is visually and structurally deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs’ trademark.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed for injunction by the Plaintiff restraining the Defendant from selling, offering for sale,

Case BriefsDistrict Court

While determining whether there is infringement of trademark, one is not required to see dissimilarity, but one is required to see similarity and there is similarity of all words except one word, in the present case.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The permanent injunction passed shall come into effect from 1-11-2022.

Colgate
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Colgate Palmolive Company (‘plaintiff’) seeking permanent injunction, restraining infringement of trademark COLGATE,

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi (‘plaintiff’) seeking relief of permanent injunction and

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Bombay High Court: In a case filed by Atomberg Technologies Private Limited (‘plaintiff’) seeking temporary injunction as Polycab India Limited

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a suit filed by Vasundhara Jewelers Private Limited (‘plaintiff’), praying for an ad-interim injunction restraining the

competitive exam
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The considerations, while deciding an application for grant of ad-interim injunction could be less stringent than the one for final relief in a suit. Interim decisions are required to be made based on probable rather than a definitive view.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

The advertisements on the Facebook page and YouTube channel alone, in my prima facie opinion, cannot be sufficient to deny the plaintiff its statutory rights as a registered proprietor of the mark.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

There cannot be a surgical separation of the word and it would be an overall impression of the mark that would be considered.

Case BriefsHigh Courts

Delhi High Court: In a case filed by CROSSFIT gym (‘Plaintiff’) having CROSSFIT trademarks seeking permanent injunction against defendant gym using the

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

    Delhi High Court: In a case filed by Livspace Pte. Ltd. (‘plaintiff 1') and Home Interior Designs E-Commerce Private Limited

Calcutta High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court | While awarding the injunction, Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J. restrained the Enforcement Directorate from giving effect to the impugned order