assessment order passed in compliance with ITAT ruling
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The Rajasthan High Court held that disciplinary action against a quasi-judicial officer is permissible only where there is evidence of mala fide intent, conscious violation of law, or intent to grant undue benefit.

Bombay High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The jurisdictional parameter about failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment are missing and without compliance with the said parameters, the respondents have no jurisdiction to proceed with the reopening of the assessment.

Delhi High Court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“It is only once the Assessing Officer of the non-searched entity is satisfied that the material coming into its possession is likely to “have a bearing on the determination of the total income” that a notice under Section 153C would be issued.”