National Conference on Law and Policy on Cyber Crimes and Artificial Intelligence
Welcome to the Temple City of Tamil Nadu, Tiruchirappalli! The Centre for Research, Development, and Training in Cyber Laws and Cyber Security
AI
EU adopts Artificial Intelligence Act which lays down harmonised rules to regulate AI
In a pioneering step, the European Parliament on 13-03-2024, adopted 459-pages long Regulation drafted to ensure safety, compliance with fundamental rights and boost innovation.
“Inventor within the meaning of Patents Act, 1977 must be a natural person”; UK SC upholds Comptroller’s refusal to regard DABUS the AI Machine as ‘inventor’
The Court unanimously stated that the Comptroller was right in determining that the appellant was not entitled to apply for the patents simply by his ownership of DABUS.
EU passes proposal to Regulate Artificial Intelligence
The Member of European Parliament adopted the EU’s AI Act with 499 votes in favour.
NYC adopts Final Regulations on Use of AI in Hiring and Promotion
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) adopted its Final Rule to implement Local Law 144, which regulates
The Regulation of Telemedicine: A Global Comparative Analysis
by Shantanu Mukherjee† and Vatsala Sood††
Everything you need to know on why AI Machine can’t be “Inventor”: US District Court rules AI still to reach sophistication to satisfy meaning of inventorship
United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia: Leonie M Brinkema, J., observed that, Congress’s use of the term “individual” in the
Here’s how DABUS an Artificial Intelligence System was given status of an “Inventor” | Federal Court of Australia’s exhaustive decision on whether a non-human can be named as an inventor
Federal Court of Australia: While addressing the question of whether Artificial Intelligence Systems can be an inventor for the purposes of the
The Curious Case of Dabus: Who should own the AI-Related inventions?
by Saransh Chaturvedi*