Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-Judge Bench comprising of Uday Umesh Lalit, Hemant Gupta* and S. Ravindra Bhat, JJ., addressed the instant appeal filed

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“While striking balance between the mitigating and aggravating circumstances, public interest, impact on the society as a whole will always be tilt in favour of the suitable higher punishment.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Even if a male member had taken premises on rent, he is tenant in his individual capacity and not as Karta of Hindu Undivided Family in the absence of any evidence that Karta was doing the business for and on behalf of Joint Hindu Family.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court of India: The Division Bench comprising of Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah*, JJ., addressed the instant appeal challenging the

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench of Rohinton Fali Nariman* and B.R. Gavai, JJ., addressed the instant appeal involving the question that whether

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“A convict or an undertrial prisoner, who disobeys the law of the land, cannot oppose his transfer from one prison to another, be a convict or an undertrial prisoner, Courts are not to be a helpless bystander, when the rule of law is being challenged with impunity.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“All that is required is a little more effort to cull out such information from both sides (purchaser of bond and political party) and do some “match the following”.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“NCLAT appears to have granted the relief of reinstatement gratis without any foundation in pleadings, without any prayer and without any basis in law, thereby forcing upon the appellant an Executive Chairman, who now is unable to support his own reinstatement. “

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Disapprobation of governmental inaction cannot be branded as an attempt to promote hatred between different communities.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The structures of our society have been created by males and for males. As a result, certain structures that may seem to be the “norm” and may appear to be harmless, are a reflection of the insidious patriarchal system.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Anyone can make mistakes. The consequences of mistakes should not be unduly harsh”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In an important ruling relating to the corporate insolvency resolution process concerning the corporate debtor, Jaypee Infratech Limited, the 3-judge

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

The Magistrates are the first lines of defence for both the integrity of the criminal justice system, and the harassed and distraught litigant.

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

There was no justification shown by the Government to restrict the relief of not charging interest on interest with respect to the loans up to Rs. 2 crores only and that too restricted to only 8 categories.

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, BR Gavai and Hrishikesh Roy, JJ has held that given the object of speedy

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In the petition seeking for standard operating procedures for implementation of pre-litigation mediation under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act,

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In the case where the State Advisory Board had heard a detenu on video conference, without any sufficient prior intimation

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“Judges play – at all levels – a vital role as teachers and thought leaders. It is their role to be impartial in words and action, at all times. If they falter, especially in gender related crimes, they imperil fairness and inflict great cruelty in the casual blindness to the despair of the survivors.”

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The Division Bench comprising of R. F. Nariman* and B.R. Gavai, JJ., addressed the instant case regarding statutory interpretation.  The

Continue reading
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“One can imagine the serious hardship that would be caused to the consumers, if cases which have been already instituted before the NCDRC were required to be transferred to the SCDRCs as a result of the alteration of pecuniary limits by the Act of 2019.”

Continue reading