karnataka high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The High Court also issued directions for effective implementation of POCSO Act and amendments introduced in the CrPC in 2018 vis-à-vis notifying the informants or victims about filing of regular and anticipatory bail applications and other connected issues.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The issue under consideration is whether the result of a polygraph test can become ground of discharge of an accused at stage of charge and could the learned Judge while passing order on application for grant of anticipatory bail, pass an order suggesting to the IO to conduct polygraph test of accused and victim to ascertain the truth of the matter without there being a prayer by accused or prosecution.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“This Court is not inclined to stay the impugned trade mark registration for the mark ‘SCHEZWAN CHUTNEY’. Moreover, the issue of jurisdiction of this Court would have to be considered first.”

Continue reading
bombay high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Bombay High Court held the instant applications under Section 11 of Arbitration Act as non-maintainable and dismissed the said applications.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“An act of discrimination is not only a denial of promise of equal protection before the law. Rather, every act of exclusion is an assault on the dignity of a person. Instead of providing an equal space to grow, we have been compelling the persons with disabilities to prove, time and again, that they are capable of a lot more than we think.”

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Right to recover the compensation will also be available to the Insurance Company where the offending vehicle is being operated at the time of the accident at a place for which it does not have a valid Permit.”

Continue reading
karnataka high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If the aspersions cast on the integrity of a public servant and the Investigating Officer harbours a view that an investigation is necessary, it would be in the interests of both the Government and the public servant that such a nagging suspicion is obliterated”.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present suit relates to the idea of a storytelling platform, there can be no monopoly over the running of such a platform. However, all such platforms that share stories about various individuals/subjects would be attaching/incorporating their own creative ways to communicate and disseminate the said stories, which constitute the expression. Such expression is protectable under Copyright law.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“Primary aim of refresher course is to strengthen knowledge of old photographer in the light of advancement that has occurred in field of photography, equipment and related techniques, digital mode, etc. The refresher course is intended to upgrade all old school photographers and enhance their knowledge and skill, as digital technology has modified entire process of camera and photographs.”

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“If an ad interim injunction is not granted in the present case it will cause irreparable loss to the plaintiff, as the defendants’ packaging is deceptively similar to that of the plaintiff’s, which causes confusion to the customers.”

Continue reading
bombay high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Taking a narrow view as to what acts could constitute an obscenity would be a retrograde act. Surely the provisions of Section 294 of IPC would not apply to all the situations and thus, the Court cannot countenance a situation where acts such as the ones referred to in the FIR would be judged by a Police Officer, who in his personal opinion considers them to be obscene acts to cause annoyance to any member of the public.

Continue reading
calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court held that when a decision involves a commercial transaction, it is primarily governed by commercial considerations not any public interest.

Continue reading
chhattisgarh high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Family Court has committed an error of law in allowing the application under Section 311 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 along with the certificate issued under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.”

Continue reading
calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court held Arbitrator’s refusal to decide question of interest under the MSMED Act constitutes a “decision” and therefore, can be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Family Courts Act, 1984 was enacted pursuant to the 59th Report of the Law Commission wherein it was stressed that in dealing with the disputes concerning the family, the family court should adopt an approach radically different from that adopted in ordinary civil proceedings.”

Continue reading
calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“By the Civil Procedure Code (amendment Act, 1999) the scope of Section 115 of the code has been curtailed but that does not mean that due to such curtailment, the High court’s power of superintendence under Article 227 has been expanded.”

Continue reading
delhi high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

LADLI Scheme, Delhi Pension Scheme for Women in Distress, National Family Benefit Scheme and Delhi Pension Schemes for Women in Distress and National Family Benefit Scheme are few schemes for orphaned children who lost either one or both parent(s) on account of COVID-19.

Continue reading
calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

Calcutta High Court determined that the compromise decree indicated that the vendors-defendants (respondent 2 and 3) do not have title to the property.

Continue reading
calcutta high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The first appellate court’s decision to set aside the ex-parte decree and remand the case was seen as unnecessary and not in line with the purpose of Order 18 Rule 4 of CPC.

Continue reading
rajasthan high court
Case BriefsHigh Courts

“The Tax Board ignored the ordinary definition of namkeen, specification of namkeen as set out by the Bureau of Indian Standard and the FSSAI licenses granted to the petitioner, which categorizes the product in question as namkeen.”

Continue reading