HIGH COURT JANUARY 2025 WEEKLY ROUNDUP | Khadi’s Device Mark; Police Protection for Live-In Couples; Wonderchef’s Reputation; and more
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Continue reading
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Continue reading
The Court stated that there was no award passed by the Labour Court directing the respondent to pay the benefits claimed by the petitioner.
Continue reading
On 31-01-2025, the Finance Minister tabled the Economic Survey 2024-25, which indicates that India’s GDP growth is expected to range between 6.3% and 6.8% in 2025-26, supported by robust private consumption and investment.
Continue reading
The Court held that the defendant had no real prospect of successfully defending their claim for tagline “Hamesha Istemaal Kare or Kapde Me Chamak Paaye”; and there was no other compelling reason as to why the Ghadi’s claim should not be disposed of before recording of oral evidence vide a summary judgment.
Continue reading
The Court granted injunction in favour of Wonderchef while bearing in mind that free speech cannot be lightly proscribed, and commercial speech formed a part of it.
Continue reading
The Court took note of the fact that in Karbi Anglong District, rat hole mining is rampant, and it is either going unnoticed or authorities are not taking any action to stop them, despite having knowledge.
Continue reading
The appointment is for a term of Five years with effect from January 21, 2025.
Continue reading
EBC brings Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai’s book on ‘Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: A Practitioner’s Guide’.
Continue reading
The Court held that the petitioner approached the Court raising hue and cry about the violation of the principle of natural justice with an oblique motive to create a defence at the appellate stage, immediately after the culmination of the proceedings before the Consumer Forum.
Continue reading
“Consideration to condone can be made only if there is a reasonable explanation and the condonation cannot be merely because the appellant is a Government body where procedural and bureaucratic delays are well known.”
Continue reading
“In a selection process, the scope of the candidates for participation should not be narrowed down by imposing unwarranted conditions rather more candidates should be allowed to participate so that better qualified candidates may be selected.”
Continue reading
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Continue reading
The accused, a 32-year-old MBA graduate from Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, was incarcerated for almost two months for drunk driving, violating check posts and damaging police barricades.
Continue reading
The Court held that he was not aided by Section 21 since he was not extradited by the Union of India from Armenia but instead came of his own volition.
Continue reading
“The object of compassionate appointment is to relieve the hardship due to the death of a bread winner in the family and the appointment is provided to redeem the family in distress. At the same time, it is to be borne in mind that compassionate appointment cannot be construed as opening an alternative mode of recruitment to public employment.”
Continue reading
The Court noted that the report of Administrative Judge with regard to work and conduct of the petitioner was also without granting him an opportunity of being heard.
Continue reading
Bombay High Court suggested State to seek extension for the entry of Maharashtra Women Diving Team since fresh trials were soon to be conducted.
Continue reading
“Though the Constitutional Courts are the sentinels of justice, however, this power of judicial review is required to be exercised with due care and caution and interference at the stage of investigation is made in rare and exceptional cases.”
Continue reading
“While liberty and dignity of an individual must be held high, however, no one can be permitted to subvert and cause devolution in the process of justice.”
Continue reading
The Court noted that admittedly, before the respondent’s retirement, neither any departmental inquiry was initiated against him nor was any show cause notice issued to him.
Continue reading