unlawful assembly
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“The Trial Court overlooked the consistent and corroborated testimony of injured eyewitnesses and failed to appreciate the legal effect of the active participation of the appellants as members of an unlawful assembly. The High Court, in reversing the acquittal, has given cogent and well-reasoned findings based on a proper appraisal of the record.”

2002 post Godhra riots case
Case BriefsHigh Courts

The present case is of year 2005, the judgment was delivered on 29-5-2006 and now it has been more than 19 years which has passed. Therefore, it will not be in the interest of the accused to remit or remand the matter to the Trial Court from the stage of recording the supplementary statement of the accused concerned under Section 313 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

2002 Gujarat Riots
Case BriefsSupreme Court

“In cases of group clashes where a large number of persons are involved, an onerous duty is cast upon the Courts to ensure that no innocent bystander is convicted and deprived of his liberty.”

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: The bench of CT Ravikumar* and Sudhanshu Dhulia, JJ  has held that merely because some of the convicts had died

Case BriefsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: In a case where an accused merely pointed to the house where the victim was hiding, thereby helping a fully