No Clause, No Deduction: Delhi HC Sets Aside Arbitral Award Allowing MGCC Shortfall Deduction as Patently Illegal
“There cannot be quarrel with the proposition that no clause can be read into the contract entered between the parties.”
“There cannot be quarrel with the proposition that no clause can be read into the contract entered between the parties.”
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that deduction towards Minimum Guaranteed CENVAT Credit (MGCC) shortfall was impermissible in the absence of an express contractual clause. The Court also ruled that limitation commenced from the date of actual deduction from final invoices and not from a prior notice contemplating such deduction.
The Court held that deduction for shortfall in Minimum Guaranteed CENVAT Credit (MGCC) could not be made from the net contract value, as such an interpretation would effectively result in a double deduction unsupported by the contract terms.
Justice Avneesh Jhingan, Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha and Justice Dinesh Mehta were transferred to Delhi High Court from their respective High Courts on 14-10-2025.
“Even while passing administrative order having civil consequences, the reasons are not only to be recorded but are to be supplied to the affected parties.”
In the instant matter, the petitioner had filed a motion challenging the cancellation of the appointment and sought a stay due to violation of Section 7 of the Rajasthan Madrasa Board Act, 2020.
The Collegium had earlier (03-08-2023) proposed to transfer Justice Jhingan to Gujarat High Court, however, the proposal was pending before the Government since 11-08-2023.