Avoidable transaction and the offenders window of escape: A perspective
by Naman Singh Bagga†, Maneesh Subramaniam†† and Anurag Tripathi†††
insolvency and bankruptcy code
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code| Nothing wrong with IBC Notification treating personal guarantors differently from other categories of individuals: Supreme Court
Supreme Court: Adding to the series of verdicts on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the bench of L. Negaswara Rao and
Ineligible promoters under Section 29A IBC can’t propose compromise or arrangement schemes under Section 230 of the Companies Act, 2013: Supreme Court
“The purpose of the ineligibility under Section 29A is to achieve a sustainable revival and to ensure that a person who is the cause of the problem either by a design or a default cannot be a part of the process of solution.”
‘Commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors is not to be interfered with’; Supreme Court sheds light on the limited scope of interference by NLAT/NCLAT
“The limited judicial review, which is available, can in no circumstance trespass upon a business decision arrived at by the majority of CoC.”
Bar under Section 10A IBC on initiation of CIRP applies retrospectively; ‘March 25, 2020’ consciously added as it coincides with the imposition of National Lockdown: SC
“The onset of the Covid-19 pandemic is a cataclysmic event which has serious repercussions on the financial health of corporate enterprises.”
Collusive transactions with the Corporate Debtor would not constitute a ‘financial debt’ under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code: Supreme Court
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of Dr. DY Chandrachud*, Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee, JJ has held that collusive transactions with the
Central Govt. extends the period for suspension of initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process by 3 months
S.O. 4638(E)— In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (31 of 2016), the
E-launch of Akaant Mittal’s Book on Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
On 12th December, 2020 Eastern Book Company held its first virtual book launch and panel discussion on the occasion of the release
All petitions challenging the IBC provisions relating to personal guarantors transferred to Supreme Court
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is at a nascent stage and it is better that the interpretation of the provisions of the Code is taken up by the Supreme Court to avoid any confusion.
IBC Ordinance 2020: Calibrated Approach & Contradiction
by P. Nagesh* & Akshay Sharma**
Increase of threshold — Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 | An Act done in Haste?
by Wasim Beg* & Swarnendu Chatterjee**
Implications of Increased threshold under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
by Akshay Sharma and Kunwar Surya Pratap*
TDSAT | Migration of Cellular Mobile Telephone Service license to Unified License of Aircel Ltd; held, should not be rejected on grounds of misrepresentation of authority
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal: Justice S.K Singh (Chairperson), while hearing a petition regarding the dispute relating to the procedures to
Big relief for homebuyers as SC upholds the validity of the 2018 Amendments to IBC
Supreme Court: The 3-judge bench of RF Nariman, Sanjiv Khanna and Surya Kant, JJ has held the Amendment Act to Insolvency and
Trade Union is an operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Supreme Court: Holding that the trade union represents its members who are workers, to whom dues may be owed by the employer,
Call For Papers : UGC Sponsored National Seminar on IBC 2016: A Paradigm Shift
Chanakya National Law University is organizing a One-Day UGC Sponsored National Seminar on “INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE: A PARADIGM SHIFT” which focuses
Erstwhile Directors of corporate debtor must be given the resolution plans for attending CoC meetings
Supreme Court: The Bench of RF Nariman and Navin Sinha, JJ, yet again dealing with an issue relating to the Insolvency and
NCLT | TATA Chemicals’ petition under IBC Code dismissed with heavy cost of Rs 10 lakhs, for being filed with ulterior motive
National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench: This Bench comprising Mr V.P. Singh and Mr Ravikumar Duraisamy as members dismissed a petition filed