
Bar Council of Delhi


‘Conclusion must have reasons to stand on’: Supreme Court sets aside unreasoned BCI order dismissing revision petition on Advocates’ professional misconduct
Supreme Court reiterated that that an order of affirmation may not require elaborate reasons as required in the case of an order of reversal, but it does not mean that such order of affirmation need not contain any reason at all.

Delhi High Court discharges advocate for contempt of Court due to medical reasons; Directs Bar Council to assess his fitness to practice
The Delhi High Court refrained from taking any coercive action against advocate for contempt of Court in view of his medical condition.

Firing at Tis Hazari Court | BCD suspends one advocate; incident raises serious concern over security in District Courts
Courts are not only the workplace for advocates and judges. Ordinary people visit courts with the hope of seeking justice through the law of the land, and incidents like Tis Hazari firing bring a lot of doubts among the visitors.

Delhi High Court permits a South Korean national, a NALSAR graduate to be enrolled as an Advocate in view of Section 24 Advocates Act
Delhi High Court held that foreign nationals are not per se barred from being considered for enrolment under Section 24 of Advocates Act.

Bar Council of Delhi makes it mandatory for the Law Graduates willing to enrol to be a resident of Delhi/ NCR
On 13-4-2023, the Bar Council of Delhi (‘Council') issued a circular for the Law Graduates directing them to attach the copy of

Delhi High Court | Uniform for advocates to have white band not black ties; Interns to wear white shirt and black ties along with black pants and black coats
Under the Advocates Act, 1961, Section 49 vests powers in the Bar Council of India to make rules over a variety of subject matters.
Del HC | CM Advocates Welfare Scheme: Only for the Advocates enrolled with Voter ID of Delhi? HC enumerates significance of Place of Practice v. Place of Residence
Delhi High Court: Prathiba M. Singh, J., remarked that, Insurance for lawyers has been an aspiration for several years. In the present
All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules
Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. dismissed a petition filed against the order which rejected