Bringing you the Best Analytical Legal News
“The officials of the applicant, i.e., the Airport Authority of India, may have been over cautious in protecting its interest and hence impleaded Respondent 1 which is the owner of the aircrafts”.
‘Courts, while evaluating a challenge under Section 34, would not be justified in faulting an award merely because an alternative view was possible or that, in their opinion, a more just conclusion could have been reached.’
The Court perused the opinion of the Medical Board, which reflects that colour vision of the petitioner was normal and he was fit to be employed on the post in question.
A quick legal roundup to cover important stories from all High Courts this week.
Rajasthan High Court held that contractual engagement does not confer a vested right of employment to workers engaged through placement agencies.